TY - JOUR T1 - Impact of Total Hip Replacements on the Incidence of Hip Fractures in Norway During 1999–2019. A NOREPOS Study JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2022.03.29.22272896 SP - 2022.03.29.22272896 AU - Helena Kames Kjeldgaard AU - Haakon E Meyer AU - Martin O’Flaherty AU - Ellen M Apalset AU - Cecilie Dahl AU - Nina Emaus AU - Anne Marie Fenstad AU - Ove Furnes AU - Jan-Erik Gjertsen AU - Mari Hoff AU - Berit Schei AU - Anne Johanne Søgaard AU - Grethe S Tell AU - Kristin Holvik Y1 - 2022/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/04/02/2022.03.29.22272896.abstract N2 - The knowledge about why hip fracture rates in Norway have declined is sparse. Concurrent with decreasing hip fracture rates, the rates of total hip replacements (THRs) have increased. We wanted to investigate if hip fracture rates continued to decline, and whether the increase in THRs had any influence on this decline, assuming that living with a hip prosthesis precludes fracture of the operated hip. Information on hip fractures in Norway 1999-2019 was available from the Norwegian Epidemiologic Osteoporosis Studies (NOREPOS) hip fracture database and population size were available in official population tables from Statistics Norway. Primary THRs (for any cause except hip fracture) 1989-2019 were obtained from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. We calculated the annual age-standardized incidence rates of hip fracture by sex for the period 1999–2019. The hip fracture rates in a scenario with no hip prostheses were calculated by subtracting 0.5 persons from the population at risk for each prevalent hip prosthesis, considering that each person has two hips at risk of fracture. We estimated how much of the decline could be attributed to the increased prevalence of hip prostheses. From 1999 to 2019, age-standardized incidence rates of hip fracture decreased by 27% in women and 20% in men. The rates remained stable in those under 70 years and decreased in those 70 years and above. Excluding replaced hips from the population at risk led to higher incidence rates, and this impact was considerably larger at higher ages. The increased prevalence of hip prostheses over the period accounted for approximately 18% (20% in women and 11% in men) of the observed decline in hip fracture rates. In conclusion, the incidence of hip fractures continued to decline, and the increasing number of people living with hip prostheses contributed significantly to the observed declining time trends.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study received funding from the Research Council of Norway (grant number 275270)Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study and the linkages of data were approved by the Regional Committee for Medical and Health Research Ethics (REK South-East A, ref 15538), the Norwegian Directorate of Health (The Norwegian Patient Registry), the Norwegian Institute of Public Health and Statistics Norway. The data were handled in accordance with the General Data Protection Regulation, and a Data Protection Impact Assessment has been conducted.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe current study is part of a research project at the Norwegian Institute of Public Health. The datasets generated and analyzed during this study are not publicly available due to data protection regulations but are made available to project members on a remote access platform. Alternatively, these data can be reconstructed anew by applying to each registry. ER -