@article {Dijk2022.03.29.22273041, author = {Stijntje W. Dijk and Eline Krijkamp and Natalia Kunst and Cary P. Gross and John B. Wong and M.G. Myriam Hunink}, title = {Emerging Therapies for COVID-19: the value of information from more clinical trials}, elocation-id = {2022.03.29.22273041}, year = {2022}, doi = {10.1101/2022.03.29.22273041}, publisher = {Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press}, abstract = {Objectives The COVID-19 pandemic necessitates time-sensitive policy and implementation decisions regarding new therapies in the face of uncertainty. The aim of this study was to quantify consequences of approving therapies or pursuing further research: either immediate approval, use only in research, approval with research (e.g., Emergency Use Authorization), or reject.Methods Using a cohort state-transition model for hospitalized COVID-19 patients, we estimated quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and costs associated with the following interventions: Hydroxychloroquine, Remdesivir, Casirivimab-Imdevimab, Dexamethasone, Baricitinib-Remdesivir, Tocilizumab, Lopinavir-Ritonavir, and Interferon beta-1a, and usual care. We used the model outcomes to conduct cost-effectiveness and value of information analyses from a US healthcare perspective and a lifetime horizon.Results Assuming a $100,000-per-QALY willingness-to-pay-threshold, only Remdesivir, Casirivimab-Imdevimab, Dexamethasone, Baricitinib-Remdesivir and Tocilizumab were (cost-) effective (incremental net health benefit 0.252, 0.164, 0.545, 0.668 and 0.524 QALYs and incremental net monetary benefit $25,249, $16,375, $54,526, $66,826 and $52,378). Our value of information analyses suggest that most value can be obtained if these 5 therapies are approved for immediate use rather than requiring additional RCTs (net value $20.6 Billion, $13.4 Billion, $7.4 Billion, $54.6 Billion and $7.1 Billion); Hydroxychloroquine (net value $198 Million) only used in further RCTs if seeking to demonstrate decremental cost-effectiveness, and otherwise rejected; and Interferon beta-1a and Lopinavir-Ritonavir are rejected (i.e., neither approved nor additional RCTs).Conclusions and Relevance Estimating the real-time value of collecting additional evidence during the pandemic can inform policymakers and clinicians about the optimal moment to implement therapies and whether to perform further research.Competing Interest StatementDr Dijk reported receiving grants from the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation during the conduct of the study; and reported receiving grants from German Innovation Fund outside the submitted work. Ms Krijkamp reported receiving grants and personal fees from the Society for Medical Decision Making (SMDM) fellowship through a grant by the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation (GBMF7853) outside the submitted work. Dr Gross reported receiving grants from Johnson \& Johnson, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Foundation (Pfizer/Astra-Zeneca), and Genentech outside the submitted work. Dr Hunink reported receiving grants from the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation during the conduct of the study; reported receiving reimbursement for travel expenses from European Society of Radiology (ESR) and from the European Institute for Biomedical Imaging Research (EIBIR); reported receiving royalties for a textbook on medical decision making from Cambridge University Press; and reported receiving grants from the American Diabetes Association, The Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development, the German Innovation Fund, and The Netherlands Educational Grant ({\textquoteright}{\textquoteright}Studie Voorschot Middelen{\textquoteright}{\textquoteright}) outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.Funding StatementFunding/Support: This research was funded by the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation through Grant GBMF9634 to Johns Hopkins University to support the work of the Society for Medical Decision Making COVID-19 Decision Modeling Initiative. Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funder had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication. Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesKey input parameters are provided in the manuscript and Appendix. Model code, datafiles containing all input data and distributions including supplementary files will be made publicly available via [https://github.com/krijkamp/Emerging-Therapies-for-COVID-19] upon peer-reviewed journal publication. https://github.com/krijkamp/Emerging-Therapies-for-COVID-19}, URL = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/03/30/2022.03.29.22273041}, eprint = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/03/30/2022.03.29.22273041.full.pdf}, journal = {medRxiv} }