PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Alan C. Kwan
AU  - Márton Tokodi
AU  - Ishan Jain
AU  - Ernest Chang
AU  - John Theurer
AU  - Xiu Tang
AU  - Nadia Francisco
AU  - Francois Haddad
AU  - David Liang
AU  - Neal Yuan
AU  - Béla Merkely
AU  - Robert Siegel
AU  - Susan Cheng
AU  - Attila Kovács
AU  - David Ouyang
TI  - Deep Learning-Derived Myocardial Strain
AID  - 10.1101/2022.03.16.22272374
DP  - 2022 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2022.03.16.22272374
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/03/18/2022.03.16.22272374.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/03/18/2022.03.16.22272374.full
AB  - Background Echocardiographic strain measurements require extensive operator experience and have significant inter-vendor variability. This study sought to develop an automated deep learning strain (DLS) analysis pipeline and validate its performance both externally and prospectively.Methods The DLS pipeline takes blood pool semantic segmentation results from the EchoNet-Dynamic network and derives longitudinal strain from the frame-by-frame change in the length of the left ventricular endocardial contour. The pipeline was developed using 7,465 echocardiographic videos, with preprocessing steps optimized to determine the change in endocardial length from systole to diastole. It was evaluated on a large external retrospective dataset and was prospectively compared with manual within-patient acquisition of repeated measures by two experienced sonographers and two separate vendor speckle-tracking methods on different machines.Results In the external validation set, the DLS method maintained moderate agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) 0.58, p<0.001) with a bias of -2.33% (limits of agreement -10.61 to 5.93%). The absolute difference in measurements was independent of subjective image quality (ß: 0.12, SE: 0.10, p=0.21). Compared to readers on repeated measures, our method has reduced variability (standard deviation: 1.35 vs. 2.55%) and better inter-vendor agreement (ICC: 0.45 vs. 0.29).Conclusions The DLS measurement provides lower variance than human measurements and similar quantitative results. The method is rapid, consistent, vendor-agnostic, publicly released, and robust across a wide range of imaging qualities.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementAlan C Kwan reports funding support from the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation Grant 2020059. This study was partially supported by the National Research, Development, and Innovation Fund of Hungary within the framework of the Artificial Intelligence National Laboratory Program and by the Thematic Excellence Program (2020-4.1.1. TKP2020) of the Ministry for Innovation and Technology in Hungary, within the framework of the Bioimaging thematic program of the Semmelweis University.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethics committee/IRB of Stanford University gave ethical approval for this work Ethics committee/IRB of Semmelweis University gave ethical approval for this work Ethics committee/IRB of Cedars Sinai gave ethical approval for this workI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesOriginal training are available online at https://echonet.github.io/dynamic/ Other data is available upon reasonable request to authors https://echonet.github.io/dynamic/