TY - JOUR T1 - The Omicron SARS-CoV-2 epidemic in England during February 2022 JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2022.03.10.22272177 SP - 2022.03.10.22272177 AU - Marc Chadeau-Hyam AU - David Tang AU - Oliver Eales AU - Barbara Bodinier AU - Haowei Wang AU - Jakob Jonnerby AU - Matthew Whitaker AU - Joshua Elliott AU - David Haw AU - Caroline E. Walters AU - Christina Atchison AU - Peter J. Diggle AU - Andrew J. Page AU - Deborah Ashby AU - Wendy Barclay AU - Graham Taylor AU - Graham Cooke AU - Helen Ward AU - Ara Darzi AU - Christl A. Donnelly AU - Paul Elliott Y1 - 2022/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/03/13/2022.03.10.22272177.abstract N2 - Background The third wave of COVID-19 in England peaked in January 2022 resulting from the rapid transmission of the Omicron variant. However, rates of hospitalisations and deaths were substantially lower than in the first and second wavesMethods In the REal-time Assessment of Community Transmission-1 (REACT-1) study we obtained data from a random sample of 94,950 participants with valid throat and nose swab results by RT-PCR during round 18 (8 February to 1 March 2022).Findings We estimated a weighted mean SARS-CoV-2 prevalence of 2.88% (95% credible interval [CrI] 2.76–3.00), with a within-round reproduction number (R) overall of 0.94 (0·91–0.96). While within-round weighted prevalence fell among children (aged 5 to 17 years) and adults aged 18 to 54 years, we observed a level or increasing weighted prevalence among those aged 55 years and older with an R of 1.04 (1.00–1.09). Among 1,195 positive samples with sublineages determined, only one (0.1% [0.0–0.5]) corresponded to AY.39 Delta sublineage and the remainder were Omicron: N=390, 32.7% (30.0–35.4) were BA.1; N=473, 39.6% (36.8–42.5) were BA.1.1; and N=331, 27.7% (25.2–30.4) were BA.2. We estimated an R additive advantage for BA.2 (vs BA.1 or BA.1.1) of 0.40 (0.36–0.43). The highest proportion of BA.2 among positives was found in London.Interpretation In February 2022, infection prevalence in England remained high with level or increasing rates of infection in older people and an uptick in hospitalisations. Ongoing surveillance of both survey and hospitalisations data is required.Funding Department of Health and Social Care, England.Research in contextEvidence before this studyEvidence before this study A search of PubMed using title or abstract terms (“Omicron” or “BA.1” or “BA.2”) and “prevalence” without language or other restrictions, identified 51 results (with no duplicates). All 51 results were evaluated, with 18 deemed relevant. One study focused on Omicron case rates in South Africa during the early stage after the discovery of the new variant (November 2021), one described genomic surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 in the USA (June – December 2021), one analysed clinical outcomes based on health records (January – December 2021), one described the results of whole-genome sequencing of SARS-CoV-2 samples collected in North Africa (March – December 2021), and one was from a previous REACT survey round (November – December 2021). The others focused on the mutation distribution of Omicron, disease severity, immune response, vaccine effectiveness, and prevalence in animal hosts.Added value of this studyAdded value of this study We analysed data from throat and nose swabs collected at home by a randomly selected sample of residents of England, aged 5 years and older, obtained during round 18 (8 February to 1 March 2022) of the REal-time Assessment of Community Transmission-1 (REACT-1) study. We estimated a weighted prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 of 2.88% (95% CrI 2.76–3.00) in England in February 2022, which was substantially lower than that estimated in January 2022 (4.41% [4.25–4.56]). The within-round dynamics differed by age group with weighted prevalence falling among children (aged 5 to 17 years) with an R of 0.79 (0.74–0.84) and adults aged 18 to 54 years with an R of 0.92 (0.89–0.96), in contrast to the level or increasing weighted prevalence among those aged 55 years and older with an R of 1.04 (1.00–1.09). Exponential models estimated a daily growth rate advantage of 0.12 (0.11–0.13) in the odds of BA.2 (vs BA.1 or BA.1.1) corresponding to an R additive advantage of 0.40 (0.36–0.43).Implications of all the available evidenceImplications of all the available evidence Random community surveys of SARS-CoV-2 provide robust insights into transmission dynamics and identify groups at heightened risk of infection based on estimates of population prevalence that are unbiased by test-seeking behaviour or availability of tests. In England, replacement by BA.2 of other Omicron sublineages, the level or increasing rates of infection in older people and the uptick in hospitalisations in England toward the end of February 2022 require ongoing surveillance, both to monitor the levels of current (and future) SARS-CoV-2 variants and the risks of severe disease.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementFunding: The study was funded by the Department of Health and Social Care in England. The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; and preparation, review, or approval of this manuscript. Acknowledgements MC-H and BB acknowledge support from Cancer Research UK, Population Research Committee Project grant "Mechanomics" (grant No 22184 to MC-H). MC-H acknowledges support from the H2020-EXPANSE (Horizon 2020 grant No 874627) and H2020-LongITools (Horizon 2020 grant No 874739). AJP acknowledges the support of the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/R012504/1). HWard acknowledges support from a National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Senior Investigator Award, the Wellcome Trust (205456/Z/16/Z), and the NIHR Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) North West London. JE is an NIHR academic clinical fellow in infectious diseases. GC is supported by an NIHR Professorship. CAD acknowledges support from the MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, the NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Emerging and Zoonotic Infections and the NIHR-funded Vaccine Efficacy Evaluation for Priority Emerging Diseases (PR-OD-1017-20007). PE is Director of the Medical Research Council (MRC) Centre for Environment and Health (MR/L01341X/1, MR/S019669/1). PE acknowledges support from Health Data Research UK (HDR UK); the NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre; NIHR Health Protection Research Units in Chemical and Radiation Threats and Hazards, and Environmental Exposures and Health; the British Heart Foundation Centre for Research Excellence at Imperial College London (RE/18/4/34215); and the UK Dementia Research Institute at Imperial College London (MC_PC_17114).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:We obtained research ethics approval from the South Central-Berkshire B Research Ethics Committee (IRAS ID: 283787). I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAccess to REACT-1 individual-level data is restricted to protect participants anonymity. Summary statistics, descriptive tables, and code from the current REACT-1 study are available at https://github.com/mrc-ide/reactidd (doi 10.5281/zenodo.6242826). REACT-1 study materials are available for each round at https://www.imperial.ac.uk/medicine/research-and-impact/groups/react-study/react-1-study-materials/ Sequence read data are available without restriction from the European Nucleotide Archive at https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/browser/view/PRJEB37886, and consensus genome sequences are available from the Global initiative on sharing all influenza data (GISAID). ER -