TY - JOUR T1 - Quantifying the vaccine-induced humoral immune response to spike-receptor binding domain as a surrogate for neutralization testing following mRNA-1273 (Spikevax) vaccination against COVID-19 JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2022.03.09.22271896 SP - 2022.03.09.22271896 AU - Imke Kirste AU - Sayuri Hortsch AU - Veit Peter Grunert AU - Holly Legault AU - Maha Maglinao AU - Udo Eichenlaub AU - Basel Kashlan AU - Rolando Pajon AU - Simon Jochum Y1 - 2022/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/03/10/2022.03.09.22271896.abstract N2 - Background There is a need for automated, high throughput assays to quantify immune response after vaccination against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). This study assessed the combined utility of the Roche assays, Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S (ACOV2S) and Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 (ACOV2N) using samples from the 2019-nCoV vaccine (mRNA-1273, Spikevax™) phase 2 trial (NCT04405076).Methods Samples from 593 healthy participants in two age cohorts (18–54 years and ≥55 years), who received two injections with either placebo (n=198) or mRNA-1273 at a dose of either 50 μg (n=197) or 100 μg (n=198), were collected at Days 1 (first vaccination), 15, 29 (second vaccination), 43 and 57. ACOV2S results were used to assess the humoral response to vaccination in different clinical trial subgroups and were compared to a live virus microneutralization assay. Sample panels from patients with evidence of previous or concomitant infection (as identified using ACOV2N) or with an inconsistent antibody response pattern were analyzed separately.Results Receptor-binding domain (RBD)-specific antibodies were readily detectable by ACOV2S for the vast majority of participants (174/189 [50 μg dose group] and 178/192 [100 μg]) at the first time point of assessment, with non-converters predominantly older in age. Complete seroconversion for all participants was observed at the subsequent timepoint (Day 29) and before administration of the second dose of vaccine. Two weeks after the first vaccine dose (Day 15), geometric mean concentration (GMC) of antibody levels were 1.37-fold higher in the 100 μg compared with the 50 μg dose group; this difference reduced to 1.09-fold two weeks after the second dose (Day 43). In both the 50 μg and 100 μg dose groups, a more pronounced response was observed in the younger versus the older age group on Day 15 (2.49-fold and 3.94-fold higher GMC, respectively) and Day 43 (1.35-fold and 1.50-fold higher GMC). Few subjects had a previous or concomitant natural SARS-CoV-2-infection (n=8). Vaccination of pre-infected individuals boosted the immune response to very high ACOV2S results compared to infection-naïve vaccine recipients. ACOV2S measurements were strongly correlated with those from the live microneutralization assay (Pearson’s r=0.779; p<0.0001) and good qualitative agreement was achieved (100% positive and 91.8% negative percentage agreement; 90.0% positive and 100% negative predictive value).Conclusion The results from this study confirmed that ACOV2S is a highly valuable assay for the tracking of vaccine-related immune responses. Combined application with ACOV2N enables serologic monitoring for breakthrough infection or stratification of previous natively-infected individuals. The adaptive measuring range and high resolution of ACOV2S allows for the early identification of seroconversion as well as for resolution of very high titers and detection of longitudinal differences between age and dose groups. Additionally, good correlation of ACOV2S with live virus microneutralization indicates the utility of ACOV2S as a reliable estimate of neutralization capacity in routine diagnostic settings.Competing Interest StatementSimon Jochum, Imke Kirste, Sayuri Hortsch, Veit Peter Grunert and Udo Eichenlaub are employees of Roche Diagnostics. Basel Kashlan is an employee of PPD, Inc. Holly Legault, Maha Maglinao and Rolando Pajon are employees of Moderna, Inc.Funding StatementThe Phase 2 study was supported in whole or in part with Federal funds from the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response, Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority, under Contract No. 75A50120C00034, and Moderna, Inc. This analysis was funded by Roche Diagnostics.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Approval was granted by the regulatory and institutional committees for the phase 2 trial and the diagnostic protocol under which the existing samples were tested. Principal investigatorInstitution Location Laurence Chu, MDBenchmark ResearchAustin, TX Paul Bradley, MDMeridian Clinical ResearchSavannah, GA Keith Vrbicky, MDMeridian Clinical ResearchNorfolk, NE David Ensz, MDMeridian Clinical ResearchDakota Dunes, SD John Ervin, MDAlliance for Multispecialty ResearchKansas City, MO Richard Glover II, MDAlliance for Multispecialty ResearchNewton, Kansas Darrell Herrington, DOBenchmark ResearchSan Angelo, TX Barton Williams, MDTrial Management AssociatesWilmington, NC I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe authors are committed to sharing data supporting the findings of eligible studies. Access to de-identified patient-level data and supporting clinical documents with qualified external researchers may be available upon request once the trial is complete. ER -