TY - JOUR T1 - Adequacy of Nasal Self-Swabbing for SARS-CoV-2 Testing in Children JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2022.03.07.22270699 SP - 2022.03.07.22270699 AU - Jesse J. Waggoner AU - Miriam B. Vos AU - Erika A. Tyburski AU - Phuong-Vi Nguyen AU - Jessica M. Ingersoll AU - Candace Miller AU - Julie Sullivan AU - Mark Griffiths AU - Cheryl Stone AU - Macarthur Benoit AU - Laura Benedit AU - Brooke Seitter AU - Robert Jerris AU - Joshua M. Levy AU - Colleen S. Kraft AU - Sarah Farmer AU - Amanda Foster AU - Anna Wood AU - Adrianna L. Westbrook AU - Claudia R. Morris AU - Usha N. Sathian AU - William Heetderks AU - Li Li AU - Kristian Roth AU - Mary Barcus AU - Timothy Stenzel AU - Greg S. Martin AU - Wilbur A. Lam Y1 - 2022/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/03/09/2022.03.07.22270699.abstract N2 - Background The goal of this study was to characterize the ability of school-aged children to self-collect adequate anterior nares (AN) swabs for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) testing.Methods From July to August 2021, 287 children, age 4-14 years-old, were prospectively enrolled in the Atlanta area. Symptomatic (n=197) and asymptomatic (n=90) children watched a short instructional video before providing a self-collected AN specimen. Health care workers (HCWs) then collected a second specimen, and useability was assessed by the child and HCW. Swabs were tested side-by-side for SARS-CoV-2. RNase P RNA detection was investigated as a measure of specimen adequacy.Results Among symptomatic children, 87/196 (44.4%) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 by both self- and HCW-swab. Two children each were positive by self- or HCW-swab; one child had an invalid HCW-swab. Compared to HCW-swabs, self-collected swabs had 97.8% and 98.1% positive and negative percent agreements, respectively, and SARS-CoV-2 Ct values did not differ significantly between groups. Participants ≤8 years-old were less likely than those >8 to be rated as correctly completing self-collection, but SARS-CoV-2 detection did not differ. Based on RNase P RNA detection, 270/287 children (94.1%) provided adequate self-swabs versus 277/287 (96.5%) HCW-swabs (p=0.24) with no difference when stratified by age.Conclusions Children, aged 4-14 years-old, can provide adequate AN specimens for SARS-CoV-2 detection when presented with age-appropriate instructional material, consisting of a video and a handout, at a single timepoint. These data support the use of self-collected AN swabs among school-age children for SARS-CoV-2 testing.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering at the National Institutes of Health under award Numbers U54 EB027690-03S1 and U54 EB027690-03S2 and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number UL1TR002378. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:All studies were approved by the Emory University IRB and all participants provided consent (and assent, where indicated by age) prior to participating.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors ER -