RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Reflex single-gene non-invasive prenatal testing significantly increases the cost-effectiveness of carrier screening
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.05.27.21256348
DO 10.1101/2021.05.27.21256348
A1 Shan Riku
A1 Herman Hedriana
A1 Jacqueline A. Carozza
A1 Jennifer Hoskovec
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/03/06/2021.05.27.21256348.abstract
AB Objective To evaluate the clinical and cost savings benefits of adoption of a carrier screen with reflex single-gene non-invasive prenatal test (sgNIPT) in prenatal care.Method A decision-analytic model was developed to compare carrier screen with reflex sgNIPT (maternal carrier status and fetal risk reported together) as first-line carrier screening to the traditional carrier screening workflow (positive maternal carrier screen followed by paternal screening to evaluate fetal risk). The model compared the clinical outcomes and cost effectiveness between the two screening methods. These results were used to simulate appropriate pricing for reflex sgNIPT.Results Reflex sgNIPT carrier screening detected 108 of 110 affected pregnancies per 100,000 births (98.5% sensitivity), whereas traditional carrier screening detected 46 of 110 affected pregnancies (41.5% sensitivity). The cost to identify one affected pregnancy was reduced by 62% in the reflex sgNIPT scenario compared to the traditional scenario. Adding together the testing cost savings and the savings from earlier clinical intervention made possible by reflex sgNIPT, the total cost savings was $37.6 million per 100,000 pregnancies. Based on these cost savings, we simulated appropriate reflex sgNIPT pricing range: if the cost to identify one affected pregnancy is the unit cost, carrier screening with reflex sgNIPT can be priced up to $1,859 per test (or $7,233 if sgNIPT is billed separately); if the cost per 100,000 pregnancies is the unit cost, carrier screening with sgNIPT can be priced up to $1,070 per test (or $2,336 if sgNIPT is billed separately).Conclusion Using the carrier screen with reflex sgNIPT as first-line screening improves the detection of affected fetuses by 2.4-fold and can save costs for the healthcare system. A real-life experience will be needed to assess the clinical utility and exact cost savings of carrier screen with reflex sgNIPT.Competing Interest StatementSR and JH are employees of BillionToOne (or a subsidiary) and hold stock or options to hold stock in the company. JAC is compensated by BillionToOne. HH serves on the Advisory Board for BillionToOne and does not hold stock or option to hold stocks.Funding StatementBillionToOne, Inc. provided financial support for the conduct of the research and preparation of the article.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethical committee approval was not necessary given the design of study as no human participants were involved. A decision-analytical model based on population data is presented.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.