RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 SARS-CoV-2 Seroprevalence among health care workers after the first and second pandemic wave
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2022.03.03.22271855
DO 10.1101/2022.03.03.22271855
A1 Nathalie de Visscher
A1 Xavier Holemans
A1 Aline Gillain
A1 Anne Kornreich
A1 Raphael Lagasse
A1 Philippe Piette
A1 Manfredi Ventura
A1 Frédéric Thys
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/03/06/2022.03.03.22271855.abstract
AB Background The Grand Hôpital de Charleroi is a large non-academic Belgian hospital that treated a large number of COVID-19 inpatients. In the context of this pandemic, all professions-combined healthcare workers (HCWs), and not only direct caregivers, are a frontline workforce in contact with suspected and confirmed COVID-19 cases and seem to be a high-risk group for exposure. The aim of our study was to estimate the prevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in HCWs in our hospital after the first and the second pandemic wave and also to characterize the distribution of this seroprevalence in relation to various criteria.Methods At the end of the two recruitment periods, a total of 4008 serological tests were performed in this single-center cross-sectional study. After completing a questionnaire including demographic and personal data, possible previous COVID-19 diagnostic test results and/or the presence of symptoms potentially related to COVID-19, the study participants underwent blood sampling and serological testing using DiaSorin’s LIAISON® SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 IgG test for the first phase and LIAISON® SARS-CoV-2 TrimericS IgG test for the second phase of this study.Results 302 study participants (10,72%) in the first round of the study and 404 (33,92%) in the second round were positive for SARS-CoV-2-IgG antibodies. The prevalence of seropositivity observed after the second wave was 3,16 times higher than after the first wave. We confirmed that direct, prolonged and repeated contact with patients or their environment was a predominant seroconversion factor, but more unexpectedly, that this was the case for all HCWs and not only caregivers. Finally, the notion of high-risk contact seemed more readily identifiable in one’s workplace than in one’s private life.Conclusion Our study confirmed that HCWs are at a significantly higher risk of contracting COVID-19 than the general population, and suggest that repeated contacts with at-risk patients, regardless of the HCWs’ profession, represent the most important risk factor for seroconversion. (Clinicaltrials.gov number, NCT04723290)Competing Interest StatementNO.The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.Clinical TrialClinicaltrials.gov number : NCT04723290Funding StatementNO The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.Not ApplicableThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethics Committee of the Grand Hopital de CharleroiI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.Not ApplicableI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).Not ApplicableI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.Not ApplicableAll relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files