RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Exploring the experiences of loneliness in adults with mental health problems: a co-produced participatory qualitative interview study
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2022.03.02.22271346
DO 10.1101/2022.03.02.22271346
A1 Mary Birken
A1 Beverley Chipp
A1 Prisha Shah
A1 Rachel Rowan Olive
A1 Patrick Nyikavaranda
A1 Jackie Hardy
A1 Anjie Chhapia
A1 Nick Barber
A1 Stephen Lee
A1 Eiluned Pearce
A1 Brynmor Lloyd-Evans
A1 Rosie Perkins
A1 David McDaid
A1 Roz Shafran
A1 Alexandra Pitman
A1 Sonia Johnson
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/03/03/2022.03.02.22271346.abstract
AB Background Many mental health conditions are associated with loneliness, which is both a potential trigger and an exacerbating factor in mental health conditions. Richer evidence about how people with mental health problems experience loneliness, and about what exacerbates or alleviates it, is needed to underpin research on strategies to help with loneliness in this context.Methods Our aim was to explore experiences of loneliness, as well as what contributes to or helps address it, among a diverse sample of adults living with mental health problems in the UK. We recruited purposively via online networks and community organisations. Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with 59 consenting participants by video call or telephone. Researchers with relevant lived experience were involved at all stages, including design, data collection, analysis and writing up of results.Findings Analysis led to identification of four overarching themes: 1. What the word “lonely” meant to participants, 2. Contributory factors to ongoing loneliness, 3. Connections between loneliness & mental health, 4. Ways of reducing loneliness. Central aspects of loneliness were lack of meaningful connections with others and lack of a sense of belonging to valued groups and communities. Some drivers of loneliness, such as losses and transitions, were universal, but specific links were made between living with mental health problems and being lonely. These included direct effects of psychiatric symptoms, the need to withdraw to cope with mental health problems, and impacts of stigma and poverty.Conclusions The multiplicity of contributors to loneliness that we identified, and of potential strategies for reducing it, suggest that a variety of approaches are relevant to reducing loneliness among people with mental health problems, including peer support and supported self-help, psychological and social interventions, and strategies to facilitate change at community and societal levels. The views and experiences of adults living with mental health problems are a rich source for understanding why loneliness is a frequent experience in this context and what may address it. Co-produced approaches to developing and testing interventions have potential to draw on this experiential knowledge in formulating effective approaches to loneliness.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis paper presents independent research funded by the UK Research and Innovation through the Loneliness and Social Isolation in Mental Health Research Network. The study was further supported through funding from the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Policy Research Programme conducted by the NIHR Policy Research Unit (PRU) (grant no. PR-PRU-0916-22003) in Mental Health. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the UKRI or NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care or its arms length bodies or other government departments. Neither the funding bodies nor the sponsors played any role in the study design or in the collection or analysis and interpretation of data or in the writing of the report and in the decision to submit the paper for publication.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Research Ethics Committee of University College London gave ethical approval for this workI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data are not available for now.