PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Paz, Valentina
AU  - Dashti, Hassan S.
AU  - Garfield, Victoria
TI  - Is there an association between daytime napping, cognitive function and brain volume? A Mendelian randomisation study in the UK Biobank
AID  - 10.1101/2021.09.28.21264215
DP  - 2022 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2021.09.28.21264215
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/02/18/2021.09.28.21264215.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/02/18/2021.09.28.21264215.full
AB  - Daytime napping has been associated with cognitive function and brain health in observational studies. However, it remains elusive whether these associations are causal. Using Mendelian randomisation (MR), we studied the relationship between habitual daytime napping and cognitive/structural brain outcomes. Data were from UK Biobank (UKB) (maximum n= 378 932; mean age= 57 years). Our exposure (daytime napping) was instrumented using 92 previously identified genome-wide, independent genetic variants (single-nucleotide polymorphisms, SNPs). Our cognitive outcomes were reaction time and visual memory; our neuroimaging outcomes were total brain volume and hippocampal volume (cm3). Inverse-variance weighted (IVW) MR was implemented, with sensitivity analyses including MR-Egger and the Weighted Median Estimator for horizontal pleiotropy. We also tested different daytime napping instruments (47 SNPs, 86 SNPs and 17 SNPs) to ensure the robustness of our results. Our main MR analysis (IVW) showed an association between genetic liability to habitual daytime napping and larger total brain volume (unstandardised ß=15.80 cm3, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.25; 31.34), but not hippocampal volume (ß=-0.03 cm3, 95%CI=-0.13; 0.06). No associations were found between daytime napping and reaction time (expß=1.01, 95%CI=1.00; 1.03), or visual memory (expß=0.99, 95%CI=0.94; 1.05). Additional analyses with 47 SNPs (adjusted for excessive daytime sleepiness), 86 SNPs (excluding sleep apnoea) and 17 SNPs (no sample overlap with UKB) were largely consistent with our main findings. MR-Egger and Weighted Median Estimator approaches showed no evidence of horizontal pleiotropy. Overall, we observed evidence of an association between genetically-instrumented daytime napping and larger total brain volume, but no evidence of an association between habitual daytime napping and hippocampal volume, reaction time or visual memory. Future studies could focus on the associations between napping and other cognitive/brain outcomes, as well as replication of these findings using other datasets and methods.Key MessagesDaytime napping has been linked with cognitive function and brain health in observational studies, but whether these links are causal remains elusive.Using Mendelian randomisation, we investigated the potential causal role of habitual daytime napping on cognitive and neuroimaging outcomes.We observed evidence of a modest causal association between habitual daytime napping and larger total brain volume, but not enough evidence to support associations with hippocampal volume, reaction time or visual memory.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by Programa de Desarrollo de las Ciencias Basicas (PEDECIBA, MEC-UdelaR, Uruguay) to [VP]; Agencia Nacional de Investigacion e Innovacion (ANII, Uruguay) [grant number MOV_CA_2020_1_163153 to VP]; Comision Sectorial de Investigacion Cientifica (CSIC, UdelaR, Uruguay) to [VP]; Comision Academica de Posgrados (CAP, UdelaR, Uruguay) to [VP]; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) [grant number K99HL153795 to HSD] and; Diabetes UK and British Heart Foundation [grant number 15/0005250 to VG].Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This work was conducted under the approved UK Biobank project number 71702I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe UK Biobank data are publicly available to all bona fide researchers at https://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk