PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Cisneros-Villanueva, Mireya AU - Blancas, Sugela AU - Cedro-Tanda, Alberto AU - Ríos-Romero, Magdalena AU - Hurtado-Córdova, Eduardo AU - Almaraz-Rojas, Oscar AU - Ortiz-Soriano, Diana R. AU - Álvarez-Hernández, Víctor AU - Arriaga-Guzmán, Ivonne E. AU - Tolentino-García, Laura AU - Sánchez-Vizcarra, Antonia AU - Lozada-Rodríguez, Laura F. AU - Peralta-Arrieta, Irlanda AU - Pérez-Aquino, José E. AU - Andonegui-Elguera, Marco A. AU - Cendejas-Orozco, Mariana AU - Mendoza-Vargas, Alfredo AU - Reyes-Grajeda, Juan P. AU - Campos-Romero, Abraham AU - Alcantar-Fernández, Jonathan AU - Luis Moreno-Camacho, José AU - Gallegos-Rodriguez, Jorge AU - Esparza-Luna-Ruiz, Marco AU - Ortiz-Ramirez, Jesus AU - Gonzalez, Mariana Benitez AU - Uribe-Figueroa, Laura AU - Ruiz, Rosaura AU - Angulo, Ofelia AU - Herrera, Luis A. AU - Hidalgo-Miranda, Alfredo TI - Validation of the RT-LAMP assay in a large cohort of nasopharyngeal swab samples shows that it is a useful screening method for detecting SARS-CoV-2 and its VOC variants AID - 10.1101/2022.02.15.22270954 DP - 2022 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2022.02.15.22270954 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/02/17/2022.02.15.22270954.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/02/17/2022.02.15.22270954.full AB - The COVID-19 pandemic is challenging the global supply chain and equipment needed for mass testing with RT-qPCR, the gold standard for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis. Here, we propose the RT-LAMP assay as an additional strategy for rapid virus diagnosis. However, its validation as a diagnostic method remains uncertain. In this work, we validated the RT-LAMP assay in 1,266 nasopharyngeal swab samples with confirmed diagnosis by CDC 2019-nCoV RT-qPCR. Our cohort was divided, the first (n=984) was used to evaluate two sets of oligonucleotides (S1 and S3) and the second (n=281) to determine whether RT-LAMP could detect samples with several types of variants. This assay can identify positive samples by color change or fluorescence within 40 minutes and shows high concordance with RT-qPCR in samples with CT ≤35. Also, S1 and S3 are able to detect SARS-CoV-2 with a sensitivity of 68.4% and 65.8%, and a specificity of 98.9% and 97.1%, respectively. Furthermore, RT-LAMP assay identified 279 sequenced samples as positive (99.3% sensitivity) corresponding to the Alpha, Beta, Gamma, Delta, Epsilon, Iota, Kappa, Lambda, Mu and Omicron variants. In conclusion, RT-LAMP is able to identify SARS-CoV-2 with good sensitivity and excellent specificity, including all VOC, VOI, VUM and FMV variants.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study was funded by the SECTEI de la Ciudad de Mexico (SECTEI/047/2020).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Ethics and Research committees of Instituto Nacional de Medicina Genomica (protocol code CEI/1479/20 and CEI 2020/21). Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript. All data from sequenced samples included in this study is available at GISAID Initiative web page.