RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Vital signs as a source of racial bias
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2022.02.03.22270291
DO 10.1101/2022.02.03.22270291
A1 Bojana Velichkovska
A1 Hristijan Gjoreski
A1 Daniel Denkovski
A1 Marija Kalendar
A1 Behrooz Mamandipoor
A1 Leo Anthony Celi
A1 Venet Osmani
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/02/04/2022.02.03.22270291.abstract
AB Background racial bias has been shown to be present in clinical data, affecting patients unfairly based on their race, ethnicity and socio-economic status. This problem has the potential to be significantly exacerbated in the light of Artificial Intelligence-aided clinical decision making. We sought to investigate whether bias can be introduced from sources that are considered neutral with respect to ethnicity and race and consequently routinely used in modelling, specifically vital signs.Methods to perform our analysis, we extracted vital signs from 49,610 admissions from a cohort of adult patients during the first 24 hours after the admission to the Intensive Care Units (ICU), derived from multi-centre eICU-CRD database and single-centre MIMIC-III database, spanning over 208 hospitals and 335 ICUs. Using heart rate, SaO2, respiratory rate, systolic, diastolic, and mean blood pressure, we develop machine learning models based on Logistic Regression and eXtreme Gradient Boosting and investigate their performance in predicting patients’ self-reported race. To balance the dataset between the three ethno-races considered in our study, we use a matching cohort based on age, gender, and admission diagnosis.Findings standard machine learning models, derived solely on six vital signs can be used to predict patients’ self-reported race with AUC of 75%. Our findings hold under diverse patient populations, derived from multiple hospitals and intensive care units. We also show that oxygen saturation is a highly predictive variable, even when measured through methods other than pulse oximetry, namely arterial blood gas analysis, suggesting that addressing bias in routinely collected clinical variables will be challenging.Interpretation our finding that machine learning models can predict self-reported race using solely vital signs creates a significant risk in clinical decision making, further exacerbating racial inequalities, with highly challenging mitigation measures.Funding The funders had no role in the design of this study.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementBV, HG, DD, MK, VO are funded by the European Commission, Horizon 2020 programme, under grant 952279. LAC is funded by the National Institute of Health through NIBIB R01 EB017205.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The datasets analyzed in the current study are publicly available in the MIMIC-III repository (https://mimic.physionet.org/) and eICU-CRD repository (https://eicu-crd.mit.edu/). I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe datasets analyzed in the current study are publicly available in the MIMIC-III repository (https://mimic.physionet.org/) and eICU-CRD repository (https://eicu-crd.mit.edu/). https://mimic.physionet.org/ https://eicu-crd.mit.edu/