RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 The Investigation of Pulmonary Abnormalities using Hyperpolarised Xenon Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Long-COVID
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2022.02.01.22269999
DO 10.1101/2022.02.01.22269999
A1 James T. Grist
A1 Guilhem J. Collier
A1 Huw Walters
A1 Mitchell Chen
A1 Gabriele Abu Eid
A1 Aviana Laws
A1 Violet Matthews
A1 Kenneth Jacob
A1 Susan Cross
A1 Alexandra Eves
A1 Marianne Durant
A1 Anthony Mcintyre
A1 Roger Thompson
A1 Rolf F. Schulte
A1 Betty Raman
A1 Peter A. Robbins
A1 Jim M. Wild
A1 Emily Fraser
A1 Fergus Gleeson
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/02/02/2022.02.01.22269999.abstract
AB Background Long-COVID is an umbrella term used to describe ongoing symptoms following COVID-19 infection after four weeks. Symptoms are wide-ranging but breathlessness is one of the most common and can persist for months after the initial infection. Investigations including Computed Tomography (CT), and physiological measurements (lung function tests) are usually unremarkable. The mechanisms driving breathlessness remain unclear, and this may be hindering the development of effective treatments.Methods Eleven non-hospitalised Long-COVID (NHLC, 4 male), 12 post-hospitalised COVID-19 (PHC, 10 male) patients were recruited from a Post-COVID Assessment clinic, and thirteen healthy controls (6 female) were recruited to undergo Hyperpolarized Xenon Magnetic Resonance Imaging (Hp-XeMRI). NHLC and PHC participants underwent contemporaneous CT, Hp-XeMRI, lung function tests, 1-minute sit-to-stand test and breathlessness questionnaires. Statistical analysis included group and pair-wise comparisons between patients and controls, and correlations between patient clinical and imaging data.Results NHLC and PHC patients were 287 ± 79 [range 190-437] and 149 ± 68 [range 68-269] days from infection, respectively. All NHLC patients had normal CT scans, and the PHC had normal or near normal CT scans (0.3/25 ± 0.6 [range 0-2] and 7/25 ± 5 [range 4-8], respectively). There was a significant difference in TLco (%) between NHLC and PHC patients (76 ± 8 % vs 86 ± 8%, respectively, p = 0.04) but no differences in other measurements of lung function. There were significant differences in RBC:TP mean between volunteers (0.45 ± 0.07, range [0.33-0.55]) and PHC (0.31 ± 0.11, [range 0.16-0.37]) and NHLC (0.35 ± 0.09, [range 0.26-0.58]) patients, but not between NHLC and PHC (p = 0.26).Conclusion There are RBC:TP abnormalities in NHLC and PHC patients, with NHLC patients also demonstrating lower TLco than PHC patients despite their having normal CT scans. These abnormalities are present many months after the initial infection.Summary statement Hyperpolarized Xenon MRI and TLco demonstrate significantly impaired gas transfer in non-hospitalised long-COVID patients when all other investigations are normal.Key resultsThere are significant differences in RBC:TP mean between healthy controls and PHC/NHLC patients (0.45 ± 0.07, range [0.33-0.55], 0.31 ± 0.11, [range 0.16-0.37], 0.35 ± 0.09, [range 0.26-0.58], respectively, p < 0.05 after correction for multiple comparisons) indicating a change in lung compartment volumes between groups.There was a significant difference in TLco (%) between NHLC and PHC patients (76 ± 8 % vs 86 ± 8%, respectively, p = 0.04), despite normal or near normal FEV (%) (100 ± 13% [range 72-123%] and 88 ± 21% [range 62-113%], p>0.05.There were significant differences in CT abnormalities between NHLC and PHC patients (0.3/25 ± 0.6 [range 0-2] and 7/25 ± 5 [range 4-8], respectively) despite similarly impaired RBC:TP.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was funded by the Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, the National Consortium of Intelligent Medical Imaging and the National Institute of Health Research, British Heart Foundation Oxford Centre of Research Excellence. We would like to thank C-MORE research team for their support of this study. The Sheffield collaborators are supported by MRC/ MR/M008894/1.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This study was given ethical approval by the Health Research Authority (UK, North West-Preston Research Ethics Committee, reference 20/NW/0235), and all participants gave informed consent.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors