PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Kujat, Jacob AU - Langhans, Valerie AU - Brand, Hannah AU - Freund, Paul AU - Görlich, Nina AU - Wagner, Leonie AU - Metzke, Diana AU - Timm, Sara AU - Ochs, Matthias AU - Grützkau, Andreas AU - Baumgart, Sabine AU - Skopnik, Christopher M. AU - Hiepe, Falk AU - Riemekasten, Gabriela AU - Klocke, Jan AU - Enghard, Philipp TI - Monitoring tubular epithelial cell damage in AKI via urine flow cytometry AID - 10.1101/2022.01.31.22270101 DP - 2022 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2022.01.31.22270101 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/02/01/2022.01.31.22270101.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/02/01/2022.01.31.22270101.full AB - Acute kidney injury (AKI) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The diagnosis is currently based on urine output and serum creatinine and there is a lack of biomarkers that directly reflect tubular damage. Here, we establish flow cytometric quantification of renal epithelial cells as a potential biomarker for quantifying the severity of tubular kidney damage and for predicting AKI outcome.Methods A total of 84 patients with AKI were included in this study, divided into an exploratory cohort (n=21) and confirmatory cohort (n=63), as well as 25 controls. Urine of patients was collected and processed within 72 hours after AKI onset. Different urinary tubular epithelial cell (TEC) populations were identified and quantified by flow cytometry (FACS). Urinary cell counts were analyzed regarding AKI severity defined by KDIGO stage as well as renal recovery, length of hospital stay and occurrence of MAKE-30 events.Results Urinary TEC counts correlated with stages of AKI based on KDIGO classification and were significantly enriched in patients with AKI compared to healthy donors and inpatient controls in both cohorts. Furthermore, both proximal and distal TEC (pTEC, dTEC) counts performed well in identification of patients with AKI regardless of stage. Urinary amounts of pTEC and dTEC showed a strong correlation, with predominance of dTEC. Higher numbers of TEC were associated with extended length of hospital stay, while elevated pTEC counts were associated with the occurrence of MAKE-30 events. Follow-up measurements showed decreasing amounts of urinary TEC after AKI recovery over several days.Conclusion The amount of urinary TEC directly reflects severity of tissue damage in human AKI. Our protocol furthermore provides a basis for a deeper phenotypic analysis of urinary TEC populations.Competing Interest StatementPE, CMS, JK, PF und DM: Have developed a conservation system for urinary cells and submitted as patent.Funding StatementThis work was supported by a grant from the Jackstaedt-Stiftung and funds from the BIH-Berlin. JK was supported by a research scholarship of the Deutsche Gesellschaft fuer Nephrologie (DGfN). VL was supported by a research scholarship of the SFB650 at Charite-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethical approval was given by the ethics committee of Charite University Hospital (Charite EA1/239/16 and EA2/045/18).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.