PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Jaime Perales-Puchalt AU - Ryan Townley AU - Michelle Niedens AU - Eric D Vidoni AU - K Allen Greiner AU - Tahira Zufer AU - Tiffany Schwasinger-Schmidt AU - Jerrihlyn L McGee AU - Hector Arreaza AU - Jeffrey M Burns TI - Acceptability and preliminary effectiveness of a remote dementia educational training among healthcare professionals AID - 10.1101/2022.01.25.22269850 DP - 2022 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2022.01.25.22269850 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/01/28/2022.01.25.22269850.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/01/28/2022.01.25.22269850.full AB - Background Optimal care for families living with Alzheimer’s disease and related disorders (ADRD) has the potential to improve their lives. However, ADRD care remains under-implemented among healthcare professionals, partly due to professionals’ limited ADRD training and inexperience. Professional training might help, but most training is in person, time-intensive, and does not focus on the potential of early detection, client empowerment, and cultural competency. We aimed to explore the acceptability and preliminary effectiveness of an online ADRD training, The Dementia Update Course, which addressed these issues. We hypothesized that the Dementia Update Course would lead to increased levels of perceived ADRD care competency among healthcare professionals.Methods This was a mixed-methods research design using pre-post training assessments. The training included 59 primary care providers (PCPs) and other healthcare professionals (e.g., medical specialists, nurses, social workers). The Dementia Update Course was a remote 6.5-hour training that included didactic lectures, case discussion techniques, and materials on ADRD detection and care. Outcomes included two 5-point Likert scales on acceptability, eleven on perceived dementia care competency, and the three subscales of the General Practitioners Confidence and Attitude Scale for Dementia. We used paired samples t-tests to assess the mean differences in all preliminary effectiveness outcomes.Results The training included 18.0% of professionals that self-identified as non-White or Latino and 37.7% of professionals who served in rural areas. Most participants (90.0% and 87.5%) reported a high likelihood to recommend the training and high satisfaction respectively. All preliminary effectiveness outcomes analyzed in the total sample experienced a statistically significant improvement from pre- to post-training averaging 0.7 points in 1-5 scales (p<0.05). Most outcomes improved statistically among PCPs too.Conclusions A relatively brief, remote, and inclusive ADRD training led to high levels of acceptability and improved perceived ADRD care competency among PCPs and other healthcare professionals. Future research should include a control group and assess guideline compliance, behavioral outcomes, and health outcomes among people with ADRD and their families.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by the NIH under Grants K01 MD014177, R24 AG063724, and P30 AG072973.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The University of Kansas Medical Center Institutional Review Board waved ethical approval for this workI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors (ADRD)Alzheimer’s disease and related disorders(CLAS)Culturally and linguistically appropriate services(GPACS-D)General Practitioners Confidence and Attitude Scale for Dementia(KU ADRC)University of Kansas Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center(NAPA)National Alzheimer’s Project Act(PCPs)Primary care providers