TY - JOUR T1 - Seroepidemiological and genomic investigation of COVID-19 spread in North East region of India JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2022.01.25.22269702 SP - 2022.01.25.22269702 AU - Romi Wahengbam AU - Pankaj Bharali AU - Prasenjit Manna AU - Tridip Phukan AU - Moirangthem Goutam Singh AU - Gayatri Gogoi AU - Yasmin Begam Tapadar AU - Anil Kumar Singh AU - Rituraj Konwar AU - Channakeshavaiah Chikkaputtaiah AU - Natarajan Velmurugan AU - Selvaraman Nagamani AU - Hridoy Jyoti Mahanta AU - Himakshi Sarma AU - Ravi Kumar Sahu AU - Prachurjya Dutta AU - Sawlang Borsingh Wann AU - Jatin Kalita AU - G Narahari Sastry Y1 - 2022/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/01/26/2022.01.25.22269702.abstract N2 - Seroepidemiology and genomics are valuable tools to investigate the transmission of COVID-19. We utilized qRT-PCR, serum antibody immunoassays, and whole genome sequencing to examine the spread of SARS-CoV-2 infections in North East (NE) region of India during the first and second pandemic waves (June 2020 to September 2021). qRT-PCR analysis was performed on a selected population from NE India during June 2020 to July 2021, and metadata were collected for the region. Seroprevalence and neutralizing antibody immunoassay were studied on selected individuals (n=2026) at three time points (August 2020, February 2021 and June 2021), as well as in a cohort (n=35) for a year (August 2020 to August 2021). SARS-CoV-2 genomes of 914 qRT-PCR positive samples (June 2020 to September 2021) were sequenced and assembled, and those obtained from the sequence databases were analyzed. Test positivity rates in first and second waves were 6.34% and 6.64% in the state of Assam, respectively, and a similar pattern was observed in other NE states. Seropositivity in August 2020, February 2021, and June 2021 were 10.63%, 40.3% and 46.33% respectively, and neutralizing antibody prevalence were 90.91%, 52.14%, and 69.30% respectively. The cohort group showed the presence of stable neutralizing antibody throughout the year. Normal variants dominated the first wave, while the variant of concerns (VOCs) B.1.617.2 and AY-sublineages dominated the second wave, and identified mostly among vaccinated individuals. All eight states of NE India reported numerous incidences of SARS-CoV-2 VOCs, especially B.1.617.2 and AY sublineages, and their prevalence co-related well with high TPR and seropositivity rate in the region. High infection and seroprevalence of COVID-19 in NE India during the second wave was associated with the emergence of VOCs. Natural infection prior to vaccination provided higher neutralizing activity than vaccination alone.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), Government of India under its intramural COVID-19 projects [grant numbers MLP0158 and MLP1019].Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Institutional Human Ethics Committee of CSIR-NEIST gave ethical approval for the present work vide approval no. IHEC/NEIST20-21/201.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData that have been taken from open source databases are readily available, and if needed all data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors. ER -