TY - JOUR T1 - The McGill Approach to Core Stabilization in the Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain: A Review JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2022.01.21.22269311 SP - 2022.01.21.22269311 AU - Erica Laurin AU - Amir Minerbi AU - LCol Markus Besemann AU - Captain Isabel Courchesne AU - Gaurav Gupta Y1 - 2022/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/01/26/2022.01.21.22269311.abstract N2 - Introduction Low back pain (LBP) is a major cause of disability and is progressively becoming worse on a global scale. [1,2] The prevention and rehabilitation of LBP lacks clarity in part due to the heterogeneity of the exercise programs prescribed to treat low back pain. Some authors have proposed stabilizing exercises for lower back pain which exert minimal loads on the spine. [3,4,5] Despite a multitude of existing exercise therapies, McGill has introduced three exercises for rehabilitating lower back pain, termed the McGill Big Three (MGB3). [6,7,8,9,10] These include the curl-up, side plank and bird-dog. The purpose of this review is to investigate the clinical outcomes from prescribing the MGB3 to individuals with chronic LBP.Methods Inclusion criteria were randomized control trials that involved an intervention with MGB3 core stabilization exercises for patients with chronic low back pain. The research included articles published during any period in full English text. Studies were critically reviewed by two authors EL and GG independently and collaboratively.Results In total, four randomized control trials were included in this review. Multiple cohorts, with varying age, demographics and occupation were studied. Outcomes studied included various pain scores, patient reported functional and performance measures.Discussion Controlled clinical trials employing this method in low back pain treatment showed low quality data with mixed statistical significance, and little to no clinical significance irrespective of the measure used or even when compared to baseline. Limitations of these trials are detailed herein.Conclusion Currently there is limited data supporting the clinical benefit of the McGill approach for the treatment of low back pain based on the available randomized clinical trials. More study is required prior to widespread adoption into clinical practice.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any fundingAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript ER -