@article {Mondal2021.01.05.21249234, author = {Goutam Mondal and Yan-Hong Wang and ZaChara Catchings and Matthew Butawan and Richard J. Bloomer and Charles R. Yates}, title = {Caffeine and Methylliberine: A Human Pharmacokinetic Interaction Study}, elocation-id = {2021.01.05.21249234}, year = {2022}, doi = {10.1101/2021.01.05.21249234}, publisher = {Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press}, abstract = {Methylliberine and theacrine are methylurates found in the leaves of various Coffea species and Camellia assamica var. kucha, respectively. We previously demonstrated that the methylxanthine caffeine increased theacrine{\textquoteright}s oral bioavailability in humans. Consequently, we conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled study pharmacokinetic study in humans administered methylliberine, theacrine, and caffeine to determine methylliberine{\textquoteright}s pharmacokinetic interaction potential with either caffeine or theacrine. Subjects (n = 12) received an oral dose of either methylliberine (25 or 100 mg), caffeine (150 mg), methylliberine (100 mg) plus caffeine (150 mg), or methylliberine (100 mg) plus theacrine (50 mg) using a randomized, double-blind, crossover design. Blood samples were collected over 24 hours and analyzed for methylliberine, theacrine, and caffeine using UPLC-MS/MS. Methylliberine exhibited linear pharmacokinetics that were unaffected by co-administration of either caffeine or theacrine. However, methylliberine co-administration resulted in decreased oral clearance (41.9 {\textpm} 19.5 vs. 17.1 {\textpm} 7.80 L/hr) and increased half-life (7.2 {\textpm} 5.6 versus 15 {\textpm} 5.8 hrs) of caffeine. Methylliberine had no impact on caffeine{\textquoteright}s maximum concentration (440 {\textpm} 140 vs. 458 {\textpm} 93.5 ng/mL) or oral volume of distribution (351 {\textpm} 148 vs. 316 {\textpm} 76.4 L). We previously demonstrated theacrine bioavailability was enhanced by caffeine, however, caffeine pharmacokinetics were unaffected by theacrine. Herein, we found that methylliberine altered caffeine pharmacokinetics without a reciprocal interaction, which suggests caffeine may interact uniquely with different methylurates. Understanding the mechanism(s) of interaction between methylxanthines and methylurates is of critical importance in light of the recent advent of dietary supplements containing both purine alkaloid classes.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe study was funded by Compound Solutions, Inc.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study protocol and informed consent were approved by the University of Memphis Institutional Review Board. Study participants were informed of all procedures, potential benefits, and risks associated with the study and provided informed consent prior to any study-related procedures. The clinical study was conducted at the University of Memphis in accordance with the US Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) governing Protection of Human Subjects (21 CFR Part 50), Financial Disclosure by Clinical Investigator (21 CFR Part 54), and Institutional Review Board (IRB) (21 CFR Part 56). Moreover, the study adhered to the 1996 guidelines of the International Conference on Harmonization (Good Clinical Practice (GCP)), which is consistent with the Declaration of Helsinki as adopted in 2008.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesNo additional data, outside that included in manuscript, was generated}, URL = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/01/26/2021.01.05.21249234}, eprint = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/01/26/2021.01.05.21249234.full.pdf}, journal = {medRxiv} }