RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Testing behaviour may bias observational studies of vaccine effectiveness
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2022.01.17.22269450
DO 10.1101/2022.01.17.22269450
A1 Paul Glasziou
A1 Kirsten McCaffery
A1 Erin Cvejic
A1 Carys Batcup
A1 Julie Ayre
A1 Kristen Pickles
A1 Carissa Bonner
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/01/21/2022.01.17.22269450.abstract
AB Backgroun Recent observational studies have suggested that vaccines for the omicron variant of SARS-Cov2 may have little or no effect in preventing infection. However, the observed effects may be confounded by patient factors and preventive behaviours or vaccine-related differences in testing behaviour. To assess the potential degree of confounding, we aimed to estimate differences in testing behaviour between unvaccinated and vaccinated populations.Methods We recruited 1,526 Australian adults for an online randomised study about COVID testing between October and November 2021, and collected self-reported vaccination status and three measures of COVID-19 testing behaviour. We examined the association between testing intentions and vaccination status in the cross-sectional baseline data of this trial.Results Of the 1,526 participants (mean age 31 years): 22% had a COVID-19 test in the past month and 61% ever; 17% were unvaccinated, 11% were partially vaccinated (1 dose), 71% were fully vaccinated (2+ doses). Fully vaccinated participants were twice as likely (RR 2.2; 95% CI 1.8 to 2.8) to report positive COVID testing intentions than those who were unvaccinated (p<.001). Partially vaccinated participants had less positive intentions than those fully vaccinated (p<.001) but higher intentions than those who were unvaccinated (p=.002).Discussion For all three measures vaccination predicted greater COVID testing intentions. If the unvaccinated tested at half the rate of the vaccinated, a true vaccine effectiveness of 30% could appear to be a “negative” observed vaccine effectiveness of -40%. Assessing vaccine effectiveness should use methods to account for differential testing behaviours. Test negative designs are currently the preferred option, but its assumptions should be more thoroughly examined.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study was not specifically funded, but in-kind support was provided by authors with research fellowships. PG is supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Investigator Grant (#1080042).CB is supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC)/Heart Foundation Early Career Fellowship (#1122788). RD is supported by a University of Sydney fellowship (#197589). KM is supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Principal Research Fellowship (#1121110).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:University of Sydney Human Ethics, approval number # 2020/781I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesPlease email carys.batcup{at}sydney.edu.au for information about the data