TY - JOUR T1 - Mosaic deletions in X-linked dystonia-parkinsonism influence repeat stability and disease onset JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2022.01.12.22269181 SP - 2022.01.12.22269181 AU - Joanne Trinh AU - Theresa Lüth AU - Susen Schaake AU - Joshua Laβ AU - Björn-Hergen Laabs AU - Kathleen Schlüter AU - Jelena Pozojevic AU - Ronnie Tse AU - Inke Köenig AU - Roland Dominic Jamora AU - Raymond L. Rosales AU - Norbert Brüggemann AU - Gerard Saranza AU - Cid Czarina E. Diesta AU - Frank J. Kaiser AU - Christel Depienne AU - Ana Westenberger AU - Christine Klein Y1 - 2022/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/01/13/2022.01.12.22269181.abstract N2 - Background While multiple genetic causes of movement disorders have been identified in the past decade, modifying factors of disease expression are still largely unknown for most conditions. X-linked dystonia-parkinsonism (XDP) is an inherited neurodegenerative disease caused by a SINE-VNTR-Alu (SVA)-type retrotransposon insertion that contains a hexanucleotide repeat within an intron of the TAF1 gene. To date, four putative genetic modifiers explain about 65% of variance in age at onset in XDP. However, additional genetic modifiers are conceivably at play in XDP and may include mismatches of the SVA hexanucleotide repeat motif. We aim to identify additional genetic modifiers of XDP expressivity and age at onset (AAO).Methods Third-generation sequencing of PCR amplicons from XDP patients (n=202) was performed to assess potential repeat interruption and instability. Repeat-primed PCR and Cas9-mediated targeted enrichment were used to confirm the presence of identified repeat mismatches.Results An increased frequency of deletions at the beginning of the hexanucleotide repeat (CCCTCT)n domain was found. Specifically, three deletions at positions 11, 14, and 17 of the TAF1 SVA repeat motif of somatic mosaic origins were detected in different combinations. The most common one was three deletions (1-2-3) at a median frequency 0.425 (IQR:0.42-0.43) and deletions within positions 11 and 14 (1-2-wt) at a median frequency 0.128 (IQR:0.12-0.13). The frequency of deletions at positions 11 and 14 correlated with repeat number (r=-0.48, p=9.5×10-13) and AAO (r=0.34, p=9.5×10-7). The association with AAO still stands when including other modifier genotypes (MSH3 and PMS2) in a regression model. However, the association dissipates when including repeat numbers.Conclusion We present a novel mosaic repeat motif deletion within the hexanucleotide repeat (CCCTCT)n domain of TAF1 SVA. Our study illustrates: 1) the importance of somatic mosaic genotypes; 2) the biological plausibility of multiple modifiers (both germline and somatic) that can have additive effects on repeat instability; 3) that these variations may remain undetected without assessment of single molecules.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe study was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG FOR2488; to JT, IRK, NB, AW, and CK), by funding by the Collaborative Center for X-linked Dystonia-Parkinsonism at Massachusetts General Hospital (to NB and CK), the Else-Kroener Fresenius Foundation (to JT and NB), by intramural funds from the University of Luebeck (to JT and CK), career development award from Peter Engelhorn Foundation (to JT) and by a career development award from the Hermann and Lilly Schilling Foundation (to CK). The authors declare no conflict of interest. JT and TL had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethics committee of the University of Luebeck gave ethical approval for this work (Vote#:21-263).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors https://github.com/nanopol/xdp_sva/ ER -