PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Benjamin H. Press
AU  - Tashzna Jones
AU  - Olamide Olawoyin
AU  - Soum D. Lokeshwar
AU  - Syed N Rahman
AU  - Ghazal Khajir
AU  - Daniel W. Lin
AU  - Matthew R. Cooperberg
AU  - Stacy Loeb
AU  - Burcu F. Darst
AU  - Yingye Zheng
AU  - Ronald C. Chen
AU  - John S. Witte
AU  - Tyler M. Seibert
AU  - William J. Catalona
AU  - Michael S. Leapman
AU  - Preston C. Sprenkle
TI  - Association Between a 22-feature Genomic Classifier and Biopsy Gleason Upgrade During Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer
AID  - 10.1101/2021.11.22.21266727
DP  - 2022 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2021.11.22.21266727
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/01/12/2021.11.22.21266727.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/01/12/2021.11.22.21266727.full
AB  - Background Although the Decipher genomic classifier has been validated as a prognostic tool for several prostate cancer endpoints, little is known about its role in assessing risks of biopsy reclassification among patients on active surveillance, a key event that often triggers treatmentObjective To evaluate the association between Decipher genomic classifier and biopsy Gleason upgrade among patients on active surveillance.Design, Setting, and Participants Retrospective cohort study among patients with low- and favorable-intermediate-risk prostate cancer on active surveillance who underwent biopsy-based Decipher testing as part of clinical care.Outcomes measures and statistical analysis Any increase in biopsy Gleason grade group (GG). We evaluated the association between Decipher score using univariable and multivariable logistic regression. We compared area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of models comprised of baseline clinical variables with or without Decipher score.Results and limitations We identified 133 patients of median age 67.7 years and median PSA 5.6 ng/mL. At enrollment 75.9% were GG1 and 24.1 GG2. Forty-three patients experienced biopsy upgrade. On multivariable logistic regression, Decipher score was significantly associated with biopsy upgrade (OR 1.37 per 0.10 unit increase, 95% CI 1.05-1.79 p=0.02). Decipher score was associated with upgrade among patients with biopsy Grade group 1, but not Grade Group 2 disease. The discriminative ability of a clinical model (AUC 0.63, 95% CI 0.51-0.74) was improved with the integration of Decipher score (AUC 0.69, 95% CI 0.58-0.80).Conclusions The Decipher genomic classifier was associated with short-term biopsy Gleason upgrading among patients on active surveillance.Patient summary The results from this study indicate that among patients with prostate cancer undergoing active surveillance, those with higher Decipher scores were more likely to have higher-grade disease found over time. These findings indicate that the Decipher test might be useful for guiding the intensity of monitoring during active surveillance, such as more frequent biopsy for patients with higher scores.Competing Interest StatementDr. Cooperberg has reported personal fees from Astellas, Bayer, MDx Health, Myriad Genetics, Dendreon, Steba Biotech, Astra Zeneca and Abbvie, outside the submitted work. Dr. Loeb has reported equity in Gilead, unrelated to the current manuscript. Dr Chen reports consultation for Myovant, Abbvie, Accuray, Blue Earth, and Janssen.Funding StatementThe study did not receive any fundingAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:IRB of Yale University gave approval for this workI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors