RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Quantifying behavior change during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2022.01.10.22268799
DO 10.1101/2022.01.10.22268799
A1 Dennis L Chao
A1 Victor Cho
A1 Amanda S Izzo
A1 Joshua L Proctor
A1 Marita Zimmermann
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/01/10/2022.01.10.22268799.abstract
AB Background During the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, the most effective way to reduce transmission and to protect oneself was to reduce contact with others. However, it is unclear how behavior changed, despite numerous surveys about peoples’ attitudes and actions during the pandemic and public health efforts to influence behavior.Methods We used two sources of data to quantify changes in behavior at the county level during the first year of the pandemic in the United States: aggregated mobile device (smartphone) location data to approximate the fraction of people staying at home each day and digital invitation data to capture the number and size of social gatherings.Results Between mid-March to early April 2020, the number of events fell and the fraction of devices staying at home peaked, independently of when states issued emergency orders or stay-at-home recommendations. Activity began to recover in May or June, with later rebounds in counties that suffered an early spring wave of reported COVID-19 cases. Counties with high incidence in the summer had more events, higher mobility, and less stringent state-level COVID-related restrictions the month before than counties with low incidence. Counties with high incidence in early fall stayed at home less and had less stringent state-level COVID-related restrictions in October, when cases began to rise in some parts of the US. During the early months of the pandemic, the number of events was inversely correlated with the fraction of devices staying at home, but after the fall of 2020 mobility appeared to stay constant as the number of events fell. Greater changes in behavior were observed in counties where a larger fraction voted for Biden in the 2020 US Presidential election. The number of people invited per event dropped gradually throughout the first year of the pandemic.Conclusions The mobility and events datasets uncovered different kinds of behavioral responses to the pandemic. Our results indicate that people did in fact change their behavior in ways that likely reduced COVID exposure and transmission, though the degree of change appeared to be affected by political views. Though the mobility data captured the initial massive behavior changes in the first months of the pandemic, the digital invitation data, presented here for the first time, continued to show large changes in behavior later in the first year of the pandemic.Competing Interest StatementVC was the CEO of Evite, Inc, while the research was conducted and is currently on its board.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any funding.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The non-public data (Evite events) is not human subjects data. The other data is (or was) available.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesInstructions for obtaining the publicly available data used in the present study are documented in the Methods. The data from SafeGraph, Inc, used in the study are no longer supported or available from the source. The data from Evite, Inc, are available upon reasonable request to the authors. https://www.census.gov/geographies/mapping-files/time-series/geo/cartographic-boundary.html https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data_access/urban_rural.htm https://statepolicies.com/ https://www.bsg.ox.ac.uk/news/our-coronavirus-policy-tracker-adds-data-us-states https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/VOQCHQ https://www.safegraph.com/covid-19-data-consortium