RT Journal Article SR Electronic T1 Differential Peripheral Blood Glycoprotein Profiles in Symptomatic and Asymptomatic COVID-19 JF medRxiv FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press SP 2022.01.07.21267956 DO 10.1101/2022.01.07.21267956 A1 Chad Pickering A1 Bo Zhou A1 Gege Xu A1 Rachel Rice A1 Prasanna Ramachandran A1 Hector Huang A1 Tho D. Pham A1 Jeffrey M. Schapiro A1 Xin Cong A1 Saborni Chakraborty A1 Karlie Edwards A1 Srinivasa T. Reddy A1 Faheem Guirgis A1 Taia T. Wang A1 Daniel Serie A1 Klaus Lindpaintner YR 2022 UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/01/08/2022.01.07.21267956.abstract AB Glycosylation is the most common form of post-translational modification of proteins, critically affecting their structure and function. Using liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry for high-resolution site-specific quantification of glycopeptides coupled with high-throughput artificial intelligence-powered data processing, we analyzed differential protein glyco-isoform distributions of 597 abundant serum glycopeptides and non-glycosylated peptides in 50 individuals who had been seriously ill with COVID-19 and in 22 individuals who had recovered after an asymptomatic course of COVID-19. As additional comparison reference phenotypes, we included 12 individuals with a history of infection with a common cold coronavirus, 16 patients with bacterial sepsis, and 15 healthy subjects without history of coronavirus exposure. We found statistically significant differences, at FDR<0.05, for normalized abundances of 374 of the 597 peptides and glycopeptides interrogated, between symptomatic and asymptomatic COVID-19 patients. Similar statistically significant differences were seen when comparing symptomatic COVID-19 patients to healthy controls (350 differentially abundant peptides and glycopeptides) and common cold coronavirus seropositive subjects (353 differentially abundant peptides and glycopeptides). Among healthy controls and sepsis patients, 326 peptides and glycopeptides were found to be differentially abundant, of which 277 overlapped with biomarkers that showed differential expression between symptomatic COVID-19 cases and healthy controls. Among symptomatic COVID-19 cases and sepsis patients, 101 glycopeptide and peptide biomarkers were found to be statistically significantly abundant. Using both supervised and unsupervised machine learning techniques, we found specific glycoprotein profiles to be strongly predictive of symptomatic COVID-19 infection. LASSO-regularized multivariable logistic regression and K-means clustering yielded accuracies of 100% in an independent test set and of 96% overall, respectively. Our findings are consistent with the interpretation that a majority of glycoprotein modifications observed which are shared among symptomatic COVID-19 and sepsis patients likely represent a generic consequence of a severe systemic immune and inflammatory state. However, there are glyco-isoform changes that are specific and particular to severe COVID-19 infection. These may be representative of either COVID-19-specific consequences or of susceptibility to or predisposition for a severe course of the disease. Our findings support the potential value of glycoproteomic biomarkers in the biomedical understanding, and, potentially, the clinical management of serious acute infectious conditions.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study was funded by InterVennAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Use of the samples for this study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Stanford University under Study Review Protocol no. 55718. I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors