TY - JOUR T1 - Waning of SARS-CoV-2 Antibody levels response to inactivated cellular vaccine over 6 months among healthcare workers JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2021.12.30.21268532 SP - 2021.12.30.21268532 AU - Monica Taminato AU - Ana Paula Cunha Chaves AU - Richarlisson Borges de Morais AU - Luiz Vinicius Leão Moreira AU - Danielle Dias Conte AU - Klinger Soares Faico Filho AU - Maria Cristina Gabrielloni AU - Eduardo Alexandrino de Medeiros AU - Nancy Bellei Y1 - 2022/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/01/01/2021.12.30.21268532.abstract N2 - Background Health Care workers (HCW) are an important group affected by this pandemic and COVID-19 has presented substantial challenges for health professionals and health systems in many countries. The Brazilian vaccination plan implemented in October, so that third dose for HCW. However, the persistence of CoronaVac vaccine-induced immunity is unknown, and immunogenicity according to age cohorts may differ among individuals.Objective Evaluate the post vaccination immune humoral response and the relationship between post-vaccination seropositivity rates and demographic data among Healthcare Workers over 6 months after CoronaVac immunization.Methods A cross section study including Healthcare professionals vaccinated with CoronaVac for 6 months or more. The study was carried with the analysis of post-vaccination serological test to assess the levels of humoral response after vaccination.Results 329 participants were included. Among them, 76% were female. Overall, 18.5% were positive quantitative titles (IQR 42.87-125.5) and the negative group was 80%, quantitative titles (IQR 5.50-13.92).Conclusion It was possible to identify a group with positive quantitative titles in serological test for IgG antibody against the SARS-CoV-2. Further investigation is required to determine the durability of post-vaccination antibodies and how serological tests can be determine the ideal timing of vaccine booster doses.Competing Interest StatementThe authors M.T., and N.B. declare that the laboratory tests used in this study were courtesy of the Beckman Coulter Brazil. The other authors declare no conflicts. Funding StatementThis study did not receive any funding.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethics committee of Federal University of Sao Paulo gave ethical approval for this work.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors. ER -