TY - JOUR T1 - ESBL plasmids in <em>Klebsiella pneumoniae</em>: diversity, transmission, and contribution to infection burden in the hospital setting JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2021.12.20.21268000 SP - 2021.12.20.21268000 AU - Jane Hawkey AU - Kelly L Wyres AU - Louise M Judd AU - Taylor Harshegyi AU - Luke Blakeway AU - Ryan R Wick AU - Adam W J Jenney AU - Kathryn E Holt Y1 - 2021/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/12/27/2021.12.20.21268000.abstract N2 - Background Resistance to third-generation cephalosporins, often mediated by extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs), is a considerable issue in hospital-associated infections as few drugs remain for treatment. ESBL genes are often located on large plasmids that transfer horizontally between strains and species of Enterobacteriaceae and frequently confer resistance to additional drug classes. While plasmid transmission is recognised to occur in the hospital setting, the frequency and impact of plasmid transmission on infection burden, compared to ESBL+ strain transmission, is not well understood.Methods We sequenced the genomes of clinical and carriage isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae species complex from a year-long hospital surveillance study to investigate ESBL burden and plasmid transmission in an Australian hospital. Long-term persistence of a key transmitted ESBL+ plasmid was investigated via sequencing of ceftriaxone-resistant isolates during four years of follow-up, beginning three years after the initial study.Results We found 25 distinct ESBL plasmids. One (Plasmid A, carrying blaCTX-M-15 in an IncF backbone similar to pKPN-307) was transmitted at least four times into different Klebsiella species/lineages and was responsible for half of all ESBL episodes during the initial one-year study period. Three of the Plasmid A-positive strains persisted locally 3–6 years later, and Plasmid A was detected in two additional strain backgrounds. Overall Plasmid A accounted for 21% of ESBL+ infections in the follow-up period.Conclusions Whilst ESBL plasmid transmission events were rare in this setting, they had a significant and sustained impact on the burden of ceftriaxone-resistant and multidrug-resistant infections.summary We detected a blaCTX-M-15 plasmid (Plasmid A) that transferred four times into different Klebsiella lineages, causing 50% of ESBL episodes during the initial study. Three Plasmid A-positive strains persisted locally 3–6 years later, accounting for 21% of ESBL+ infections.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (Project Grant 1043822 to K.E.H. and A.W.J.J., Investigator Grant APP1176192 to K.L.W), the Viertel Charitable Foundation of Australia (Senior Medical Research Fellowship to K.E.H), and the Bill &amp; Melinda Gates Foundation OPP1175797. Under the grant conditions of the Foundation, a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Generic License has already been assigned to the Author Accepted Manuscript version that might arise from this submission.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The primary study was approved by the Alfred Health Human Research Ethics Committee (AHHREC), Project numbers #550/12 (19 February 2013) and #526/13 (10 December 2013). Analysis of clinical isolates 2017-2020 was approved by AHHREC, Project number #371/19 (2 July 2019).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll accession numbers are provided in Supplementary Table 1. ER -