PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Focosi, Daniele
AU  - Franchini, Massimo
AU  - Joyner, Michael J.
AU  - Casadevall, Arturo
TI  - COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ANTIBODY RESPONSES FROM COVID-19 CONVALESCENTS RECEIVING VARIOUS VACCINES REVEALS CONSISTENT HIGH NEUTRALIZING ACTIVITY FOR SARS-CoV-2 VARIANT OF CONCERN OMICRON
AID  - 10.1101/2021.12.24.21268317
DP  - 2021 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2021.12.24.21268317
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/12/26/2021.12.24.21268317.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/12/26/2021.12.24.21268317.full
AB  - The novel SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant of concern (VOCs), with its escape from unboosted vaccines and monoclonal antibodies, demonstrates the continued relevance of COVID19 convalescent plasma therapies. Lessons learnt from previous usage of CCP suggests focusing on outpatients and using high nAb-titer units in early disease stages. In this systematic analysis, we show that CCP from unvaccinated donors is not effective against Omicron, while CCP from vaccinees convalescents from previous VOCs or third-dose uninfected vaccinees is likely to remain effective against Omicron. CCP remains the only antibody-based therapy that keeps up with the variants and provides an effective tool to combat the emergence of variants that defeat monoclonal antibodies. Consequently, there is a need for continue study of the variables that determine CCP efficacy.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any fundingAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced are available online at PubMed, medRxiv and bioRxiv.