PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Cheryl Hendrickson
AU  - Lawrence C Long
AU  - Craig van Rensburg
AU  - Cassidy W Claassen
AU  - Mwansa Njelesani
AU  - Crispin Moyo
AU  - Lloyd Mulenga
AU  - Heidi O’Bra
AU  - Colin A Russell
AU  - Brooke E Nichols
TI  - The early-stage comprehensive costs of routine PrEP implementation and scale-up in Zambia
AID  - 10.1101/2021.12.18.21268023
DP  - 2021 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2021.12.18.21268023
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/12/19/2021.12.18.21268023.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/12/19/2021.12.18.21268023.full
AB  - Introduction Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is effective at preventing HIV infection, but PrEP cost-effectiveness is sensitive to PrEP implementation and program costs. Preliminary studies indicate that, in addition to direct delivery cost, PrEP provision requires substantial demand creation and user support to encourage PrEP initiation and persistence. We estimated the cost of providing PrEP in Zambia through different PrEP delivery models.Methods Taking a guidelines-based approach for visits, labs and drugs assuming fidelity to the expanded 2018 Zambian PrEP guidelines, we estimated the annual cost of providing PrEP per client for five delivery models: one focused on key populations (men-who-have-sex-with-men (MSM) and female sex workers (FSW), one on adolescent girls and young women (AGYW), and three integrated programs (operated within the HIV counselling and testing service at primary healthcare centres). Program start-up, provider, and user support costs were based on program expenditure data and number of PrEP sites and clients in 2018. PrEP clinic visit costs were based on micro-costing at two PrEP delivery sites (in 2018 USD).Results The annual cost per PrEP client varied greatly by program type, from $394 (AGYW) to $760 in an integrated program. Cost differences were driven largely by volume (i.e. the number of clients initiated/model/site) which impacted the relative costs of program support and technical assistance assigned to each PrEP client. Direct service delivery costs, including staff and overheads, labs and monitoring, drugs and consumables ranged narrowly from $208-217/PrEP-user. Service delivery costs were a key component in the cost of PrEP, representing 36-65% of total costs. Reductions in service delivery costs per PrEP client are expected with further scale-up.Conclusions The results show that, even when integrated into full service delivery models, accessing vulnerable, marginalised populations at substantial risk of HIV infection is likely to cost more than previously estimated due to the programmatic costs involved in community sensitization and user support. Improved data on individual client resource usage (e.g. drugs, labs, visits) and outcomes (e.g. initiation, persistence) is required to get a better understanding of the true resource utilization, cost and expected outcomes and annual costs of different PrEP programs in Zambia.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementUSAID funded this work through cooperative agreement AID-OAA-A-15-00070 (to CH, LCL and BEN). Research reported in this publication was also supported by the Fogarty International Center and National Institute of Mental Health through the National Institutes of Health award number D43 TW010543 (to CH) and K01MH119923 (LCL). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The authors views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the US Government.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Source data are publicly available from a manuscript published on BMJ Open: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34244265/I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors