PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Khoury, David S. AU - Steain, Megan AU - Triccas, James A. AU - Sigal, Alex AU - Davenport, Miles P. AU - Cromer, Deborah TI - A meta-analysis of Early Results to predict Vaccine efficacy against Omicron AID - 10.1101/2021.12.13.21267748 DP - 2021 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2021.12.13.21267748 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/12/17/2021.12.13.21267748.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/12/17/2021.12.13.21267748.full AB - In the studies to date, the estimated fold-drop in neutralisation titre against Omicron ranges from 2- to over 20-fold depending on the study and serum tested. Collating data from the first four of these studies results in a combined estimate of the drop in neutralisation titre against Omicron of 9.7-fold (95% CI 5.5-17.1). We use our previously established model to predict that six months after primary immunisation with an mRNA vaccine, efficacy for Omicron is estimated to have waned to around 40% against symptomatic and 80% against severe disease. A booster dose with an existing mRNA vaccine (even though it targets the ancestral spike) has the potential to raise efficacy for Omicron to 86.2% (95% CI: 72.6-94) against symptomatic infection and 98.2% (95% CI: 90.2-99.7) against severe infection.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementDSK, DC, and MPD are supported by NHMRC (Australia) Fellowship / Investigator grants. Some data in this study was supported by the Bill and Melinda Gates award INV-018944 (AS), National Institutes of Health award R01 AI138546 (AS), and South African Medical Research Council awards (AS). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This work was approved under the UNSW Sydney Human Research Ethics Committee (approval HC200242).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors