RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Diagnostic Strategies to Identify Patients with Genetic Salt-Losing Tubulopathies
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.12.12.21267676
DO 10.1101/2021.12.12.21267676
A1 Elizabeth Wan
A1 Daniela Iancu
A1 Emma Ashton
A1 Keith Siew
A1 Barian Mohidin
A1 Chih-Chien Sung
A1 China Nagano
A1 Detlef Bockenhauer
A1 Shih-Hua Lin
A1 Kandai Nozu
A1 Stephen B Walsh
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/12/14/2021.12.12.21267676.abstract
AB Background Distinguishing patients with the inherited salt-losing tubulopathies (SLT), Gitelman or Bartter syndrome (GS or BS) from wildtype (WT) patients who purge is difficult. We decided to identify clinical/biochemical characteristics which correctly classify SLT.Methods 66 patients with possible SLT were recruited to a prospective observational cohort study at the UCL Renal Tubular Clinic (London). 31 datapoints were recorded on each patient. All patients were genotyped for pathogenic mutations in genes which cause SLT; 39 patients had pathogenic variants in genes causing SLT. We obtained similar datasets from cohorts in Taipei and Kobe; the combined dataset comprised 419 patients, 291 had genetically confirmed SLT. London and Taipei datasets were combined to train machine learning (ML) algorithms. These were then tested on the Kobe dataset to determine the best biochemical predictors of genetic confirmation of SLT.Results Single biochemical variables (e.g. plasma renin) were significantly, but inconsistently different between SLT and WT, in the London and combined cohorts.A decision table algorithm using serum bicarbonate and urinary sodium excretion (FENa) achieved a classification accuracy of 74%. A simpler algorithm based on the FECl achieved a classification accuracy of 61%. This was superior to all of the single biochemical variables identified previously.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any funding.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The ethics committee of Great Ormond Street Hospital gave ethical approval for this work.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors