PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Shamil D. Cooray
AU  - Kushan De Silva
AU  - Joanne Enticott
AU  - Shrinkhala Dawadi
AU  - Jacqueline A. Boyle
AU  - Georgia Soldatos
AU  - Eldho Paul
AU  - Vincent Versace
AU  - Helena J. Teede
TI  - External validation and updating of a prediction model for the diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus
AID  - 10.1101/2021.12.05.21267329
DP  - 2021 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2021.12.05.21267329
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/12/07/2021.12.05.21267329.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/12/07/2021.12.05.21267329.full
AB  - Introduction The Monash early pregnancy prediction model calculates risks of developing GDM and is internationally externally validated and implemented in practice, however some gaps remain.Objective To validate and update Monash GDM model, revising ethnicity categorisation, updating to recent diagnostic criteria, to improve performance and generalisability.Methods Routine health data for singleton pregnancies from 2016 to 2018 in Australia included updated GDM diagnostic criteria. The Original Model predictors were included (age, body mass index, ethnicity, diabetes family history, past-history of GDM, past-history of poor obstetric outcomes, ethnicity), with ethnicity revised. Updating model methods were: recalibration-in-the-large (Model A); re-estimation of intercept and slope (Model B), and; coefficients revision using logistic regression (Mode1 C1 with original eight ethnicity categories, and Mode1 C2 with updated 6 ethnicity categories). Analysis included ten-fold cross-validation, performance measures (c-statistic, calibration-in-the-large value, calibration slope and expected-observed (E:O) ratio) and closed testing examining log-likelihood scores and AIC compared models.Results In 26,474 singleton pregnancies (4,756, 18% with GDM), we showed that temporal validation of the original model was reasonable (c-statistic 0.698) but with suboptimal calibration (E:O of 0.485). Model C2 was preferred, because of the high c-statistic (0.732), and it performed significantly better in closed testing compared to other models.Conclusions Updating of the original model sustains predictive performance in a contemporary population, including ethnicity data, recent diagnostic criteria, and universal screening context. This supports the value of risk prediction models to guide risk-stratified care to women at risk of GDM.Trial registration details This study was registered as part of the PeRSonal GDM study on the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12620000915954); Pre-results.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementtbcAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The ethics committee of Monash University gave ethical approval for this workI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors