PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Grace M. Power
AU  - Jon H. Tobias
AU  - Timothy M. Frayling
AU  - Jess Tyrrell
AU  - April Hartley
AU  - Jon Heron
AU  - George Davey Smith
AU  - Tom G. Richardson
TI  - Age-specific effects of body size on fracture risk in later life: A lifecourse Mendelian randomization study
AID  - 10.1101/2021.12.06.21267379
DP  - 2021 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2021.12.06.21267379
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/12/07/2021.12.06.21267379.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/12/07/2021.12.06.21267379.full
AB  - Musculoskeletal conditions, including fractures, can have severe and long-lasting consequences. Higher body mass index in adulthood is widely acknowledged to be protective for most fracture sites, indicated through previous clinical and epidemiological observational research. However, the association between weight and bone health is complex and sources of bias, induced by confounding factors, may have distorted earlier findings. Employing a lifecourse Mendelian randomization (MR) approach by using genetic instruments to separate effects at different life stages, this investigation aims to explore how prepubertal and adult body size independently influence fracture risk in later life.Using data from a large UK-based prospective cohort, univariable and multivariable MR with inverse variance weighted meta-analysis were conducted to simultaneously estimate the effects of age-specific genetic proxies for body size (n=453,169) on the odds of fracture in later life (n=416,795). A two-step MR framework was additionally applied to elucidate potential mediators. Univariable and multivariable MR indicated strong evidence that higher body size in childhood reduced fracture risk in later life (OR, 95% CI: 0.89, 0.82 to 0.96, P=0.005 and OR, 95% CI: 0.76, 0.69 to 0.85, P=1×10−6, respectively). Conversely, higher body size in adulthood increased fracture risk (OR, 95% CI: 1.08, 1.01 to 1.16, P=0.023 and OR, 95% CI: 1.26, 1.14 to 1.38, P=2×10−6, respectively). Two-step MR analyses suggested that the effect of higher body size in childhood on reduced fracture risk was mediated by its influence on higher estimated bone mineral density (eBMD) in adulthood.This investigation provides novel evidence that higher body size in childhood has a direct effect on reduced fracture risk in later life through its influence on increased eBMD. Results indicate that higher body size in adulthood is a risk factor for fractures, opposing findings from earlier research. Protective effect estimates previously observed are likely attributed to childhood effects.Competing Interest StatementTom G Richardson is employed part-time by Novo Nordisk outside of this work. All other authors declare no competing interests.Funding StatementThis work was in part supported by the Integrative Epidemiology Unit which receives funding from the UK Medical Research Council and the University of Bristol (MC_UU_00011/1). GDS conducts research at the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at the University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Bristol. The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the National Institute for Health Research or the Department of Health. GMP is supported by the GW4 Biomed Doctoral Training Programme, awarded to the Universities of Bath, Bristol, Cardiff and Exeter from the Medical Research Council (MRC)/UKRI (MR/N0137941/1). TGR was a UKRI Innovation Research Fellow whilst contributing to this study (MR/S003886/1). TMF has received funding from the Medical Research Council (MR/T002239/1) EU-IMI SOPHIA and GSK. JT is supported by an Academy of Medical Sciences (AMS) Springboard award, which is supported by the AMS, the Wellcome Trust, GCRF, the Government Department of Business, Energy and Industrial strategy, the British Heart Foundation and Diabetes UK (SBF004\1079). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The UK Biobank resource (https://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe primary data from the UK Biobank resource that support the findings of this study are accessible upon application (https://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/). https://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/