PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Fullerton, Paul
AU  - Sarkar, Mahbub
AU  - Haque, Shamsul
AU  - McKenzie, Wendy
TI  - Culture and understanding the role of feedback for health professions students: Realist synthesis protocol
AID  - 10.1101/2021.01.24.21250413
DP  - 2021 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2021.01.24.21250413
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/11/30/2021.01.24.21250413.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/11/30/2021.01.24.21250413.full
AB  - Introduction Clinical education has moved to a “competency-based” model with an emphasis on workplace-based learning and assessment which, in turn, depends on feedback to be effective. Further, the understanding of feedback has changed from information about a performance directed to the learner performing the task, to a dialogue, which enables the learner to act and develop.In health professional education, feedback is a complex interaction between trainee, supervisor, and the healthcare system. Most published research on feedback in health professional education originates in Europe and North America. Our interest is on the impact of Culture on this process, particularly in the context of Asian cultures.The (scientific) realist approach of Pawson and Tilley provides a means to examine complex interventions in social situations, and thus is an appropriate lens to use for this study. This is a protocol for a realist synthesis which asks how, why and in what circumstances do Asian Cultures influence health professional trainees to seek, respond to and use feedback given in the clinical environment, if at all.Methods and analysis An initial search was performed to help define the scope of the review question and develop our initial program theory. The formal electronic search was carried out in February 2020 and included: CINAHL, ERIC, MEDLINE, and PsycInfo, and repeated in October 2020.Retrieved articles were imported into Covidence for screening and data extraction, after which components of the Context – Mechanisms – Outcomes configurations will be sought to refine the initial program theory.Ethics and Dissemination As this study is a literature review, ethics approval is not required.The findings will be documented in line with the RAMESES publications standards for Realist syntheses,[41] and we plan to disseminate the findings by means of a peer-reviewed journal article and conference presentation(s).Strengths and limitations of this studyThe synthesis aims to identify the how and why Asian Cultures may influence feedback seeking and provision to health professional trainees, if at all.To our knowledge, there are few studies of feedback seeking and provision to health professional trainees in Asia.A Realist approach has the potential to help explain the complex nature of Culture’s impact on feedback.Only studies published in the English language will be included, so transferability of our findings to non-English speaking environments may be lacking.In addition to formal literature database searches, we will need to conduct citation mining to locate other relevant resources.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialNot a clinical trialFunding StatementFunding: This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethics approval not required - literature review protocol.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesProtocol - no data availability