RT Journal Article SR Electronic T1 Preventable deaths from SARS-CoV-2 in England and Wales: a systematic case series of coroners’ reports during the COVID-19 pandemic JF medRxiv FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press SP 2021.07.15.21260589 DO 10.1101/2021.07.15.21260589 A1 Swift, Bethan A1 Heneghan, Carl A1 Aronson, Jeffrey K. A1 Howard, David J. A1 Richards, Georgia C. YR 2021 UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/11/29/2021.07.15.21260589.abstract AB Objectives To examine coroners’ Prevention of Future Deaths reports (PFDs) to identify deaths involving SARS-CoV-2 that coroners deemed preventable.Design Consecutive case series.Setting England and Wales.Participants Patients reported in 510 PFDs dated between 01 January 2020 and 28 June 2021, collected from the UK’s Courts and Tribunals Judiciary website using web scraping to create an openly available database, https://preventabledeathstracker.net/.Main outcome measures Concerns reported by coroners.Public and Patient Involvement Patients and members of the public were not involved in this study.Results SARS-CoV-2 was involved in 23 deaths reported by coroners in PFDs. Twelve deaths were indirectly related to the COVID-19 pandemic, defined as those that were not medically caused by SARS-CoV-2, but were associated with mitigation measures. In 11 cases the coroner explicitly reported that COVID-19 had directly caused death. There was geographical variation in the reporting of PFDs; most (39%) were written by coroners in the North-West of England. The coroners raised 56 concerns, problems in communication being the most common (30%), followed by failure to follow protocols (23%). Organizations in the National Health Service (NHS) were sent the most PFDs (51%), followed by the Government (26%), but responses to PFDs by these organizations were poor.Conclusions PFDs contain a rich source of information on preventable deaths that has previously been difficult to examine systematically. Our openly available tool (https://preventabledeathstracker.net/) streamlines this process and has identified many concerns raised by coroners that should be addressed during the Government’s inquiry into the handling of the COVID-19 pandemic, so that mistakes made are less likely to be repeated.Study protocol pre-registration https://osf.io/bfypc/What is already known about this subject?The UK Government has stated that there will be a public inquiry into the handling of the COVID-19 pandemic, to learn lessons for future pandemics.Coroners in England and Wales have a duty to report and communicate information about the deaths they investigate when the coroner believes that action should be taken to prevent future deaths.These reports, called Prevention of Future Death reports (PFDs), had not yet been systematically analysed to identify deaths that occurred during the COVID-19 pandemic.What are the new findings?We created the Preventable Deaths Database (https://preventabledeathstracker.net/) using web scraping to systematically assess PFDs published on the Courts and Tribunal Judiciary website.Between 01 January 2020 and 28 June 2021, one in 20 (4.5%, n=23) PFDs that were published by coroners involved SARS-CoV-2.Coroners raised many concerns about the care of patients in hospitals, care homes, and people in the community during the COVID-19 pandemic, which require action to prevent future deaths.How might it affect clinical practice in the foreseeable future?Preventable deaths that occurred during the COVID-19 pandemic should be referred to the coroner so that an inquest can be performed and a PFD issued, highlightng actions that could be avoided in improving the handling of future pandemics in both the UK and elsewhere.Our tool, https://preventabledeathstracker.net/, can be used by others to examine preventable deaths in England and Wales, and to identify signals for quality improvement to reduce avoidable harms in clinical practice.Competing Interest StatementBS receives funding from Mustafa Bahceci (Bahceci Health Group, Istanbul, Turkey) for her Doctor of Philosophy studies at the University of Oxford (2019-2022) and has received financial renumeration for consultancy work in womens health. CH is a National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Senior Investigator and has received expenses and fees for his media work, received expenses from the WHO, FDA, and holds grant funding from the NIHR School for Primary Care Research (SPCR) and the NIHR SPCR Evidence Synthesis Working Group [Project 380], the NIHR BRC Oxford and the WHO. On occasion, CH receives expenses for teaching EBM and is also paid for his GP work in NHS out of hours (contract with Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust). JKA has published articles and edited textbooks on adverse drug reactions and interactions and has often given medicolegal advice, including appearances as an expert witness in coroners courts, often dealing with the adverse effects of opioids and other medicines. DJH is the Director of Studies for Sustainable Urban Development at the Department for Continuing Education, University of Oxford. DJH has received financial remuneration for providing political and socioeconomic country updates for Latin America and the Caribbean for IHS Global. GCR was financially supported by the NIHR SPCR, the Naji Foundation, and the Rotary Foundation to study for a Doctor of Philosophy (2017-2021), but no longer has any financial COIs. GCR is an Associate Editor of BMJ Evidence Based Medicine and is developing https://preventabledeathstracker.net/. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR, or the Department of Health and Social Care.Funding StatementNo grant or research funding was obtained to undertake this study.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:We are using publicly available information, for which ethics committee approval is not required.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data, statistical code, and study materials are openly available via the Open Science Framework (OSF) and GitHub Richards, G. georgiarichards.github.io. (Github). Swift, B., Heneghan, C., Aronson, J. K., Howard, D. & Richards, G. C. Preventable deaths from SARS-CoV-2 in England and Wales. OSF https://osf.io/bfypc/ (2021) doi:10.17605/OSF.IO/BFYPC. https://osf.io/bfypc/