PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Bhoowit Lerttiendamrong
AU  - Lertpong Satapongpeera
AU  - Mawin Vongsaisuwon
TI  - A cross-sectional study exploring the justification of opportunistic breast cancer screening in Thailand
AID  - 10.1101/2021.11.29.21266992
DP  - 2021 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2021.11.29.21266992
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/11/29/2021.11.29.21266992.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/11/29/2021.11.29.21266992.full
AB  - Objective Breast cancer is currently the most common malignant disease in Thailand. The present study aims to evaluate the most beneficial method of breast cancer screening in different breast densities by analyzing the benefits of screening mammography with additional breast ultrasonography classified by breast density.Method 49 middle-aged and elderly Bangkokian women who had undergone both mammography and ultrasonography were picked at random for analysis. BI-RADS scores were assigned based on mammography results alone and based on combined mammography and ultrasonography results. Concordance/discordance rates between the 2 radiographic techniques were compared in women stratified based on their breast densities.Results All of our participants were given a score between BIRADS 1 and 3, while over 40% of participants are in the BIRADS 2 category. 60% of subjects with extremely dense breasts benefit from screening mammography with additional breast ultrasonography, while only 50% of samples with heterogeneous density and 34.21% samples with heterogeneous fibroglandular breasts benefit from the extra intervention.Conclusion Our study concludes that women with higher breast density are more likely to benefit from screening using ultrasonography in addition to mammography as opposed to mammography screening alone. We recommend both mammography and ultrasonography for initial breast cancer screening. For follow-up visits, we suggest the screening method in accordance with breast density, using ultrasonography alone for women with high breast densities and mammography for women with heterogeneously dense breasts.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any fundingAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Data were obtained from the general population who had consented to the mammography and ultrasonographic interventions. Data were collected using an anonymous case report form, without any means of exposing participants personal information. IRB were not deemed necessary by the Chulalongkorn Ethical Review Board.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors