TY - JOUR T1 - Understanding the burden and mitigating risks in the utilisation of the Emergency Medical Services in the management of community mental health emergencies JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2021.11.28.21266975 SP - 2021.11.28.21266975 AU - Ian Howard AU - Nicholas Castle AU - Loua Al Shaikh AU - Robert Owen Y1 - 2021/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/11/29/2021.11.28.21266975.abstract N2 - Introduction Mental health disorders are highly prevalent globally with access to appropriate care oftentimes problematic. The Emergency Medical Services (EMS) have been suggested as a potential solution to improve access, however, it is unclear whether these services provide the most appropriate response with respect to the needs of patients experiencing a mental health emergency.Methods A multi-method study was conducted to assess the current burden and potential risks associated with the transportation of patients experiencing a mental health emergency by EMS. Part 1 utilised a cross-sectional study of routinely collected clinical data for the period January 2018 to December 2019. Part 2 employed a systematic risk identification methodology focused on identifying the hazards associated with the transportation of this patient cohort, to identify key action plans towards mitigating their occurrence.Results Patients experiencing a mental health emergency were transported at an average rate of 11.96 per 1000 transports. Approximately 7% were administered prehospital sedation, with Ketamine administered as the most common sedative. Altogether, 50 potential hazards were identified involving the transportation of patients experiencing a mental health emergency. The Patient Assessment subprocess contained the most potential hazards/failure points (n=13). Risks categorized as occasional (n=33) and moderate (n=16) made up the majority.Conclusion The burden of mental health emergencies on EMS is considerable, with the potential for several significant risks. Despite this, there was unequal focus on the development of care pathways and clinical guidance for this patient cohort compared with the more “traditional” case types serviced by EMS. Consequently, we identified several strategic-level action plans to mitigate these hazards and improve the delivery of care for these patients in the community.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any fundingAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethical approval to conduct the study was granted by the Medical Research Centre of the Hamad Medical Corporation, Qatar (Ref. no.: MRC-01-20-662).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript ER -