@article {Gozzi2021.11.24.21266820, author = {Nicol{\`o} Gozzi and Matteo Chinazzi and Jessica T. Davis and Kunpeng Mu and Ana Pastore y Piontti and Marco Ajelli and Nicola Perra and Alessandro Vespignani}, title = {Anatomy of the first six months of COVID-19 Vaccination Campaign in Italy}, elocation-id = {2021.11.24.21266820}, year = {2021}, doi = {10.1101/2021.11.24.21266820}, publisher = {Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press}, abstract = {We analyze the effectiveness of the first six months of vaccination campaign against SARS-CoV-2 in Italy by using a computational epidemic model which takes into account demographic, mobility, vaccines, as well as estimates of the introduction and spreading of the more transmissible Alpha variant. We consider six sub-national regions and study the effect of vaccines in terms of number of averted deaths, infections, and reduction in the Infection Fatality Rate (IFR) with respect to counterfactual scenarios with the actual non-pharmaceuticals interventions but no vaccine administration. Furthermore, we compare the effectiveness in counterfactual scenarios with different vaccines allocation strategies and vaccination rates. Our results show that, as of 2021/07/05, vaccines averted 29, 350 (IQR: [16, 454 - 42, 826]) deaths and 4, 256, 332 (IQR: [1, 675, 564 - 6, 980, 070]) infections and a new pandemic wave in the country. During the same period, they achieved a -22.2\% (IQR: [-31.4\%; -13.9\%]) reduction in the IFR. We show that a campaign that would have strictly prioritized age groups at higher risk of dying from COVID-19, besides frontline workers, would have implied additional benefits both in terms of avoided fatalities and reduction in the IFR. Strategies targeting the most active age groups would have prevented a higher number of infections but would have been associated with more deaths. Finally, we study the effects of different vaccination intake scenarios by rescaling the number of available doses in the time period under study to those administered in other countries of reference. The modeling framework can be applied to other countries to provide a mechanistic characterization of vaccination campaigns worldwide.Competing Interest StatementM.A. reports research funding from Seqirus, not related to COVID-19. No other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.Funding StatementN.G. acknowledges support from the Doctoral Training Alliance. A.V. acknowledges support from NIH-R56AI148284 award. M.A. and A.V. acknowledge support from the Bill \& Melinda Gates Foundation (award number INV006010) and the Google Cloud Research Credits program to fund this project. The findings and conclusions in this study are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the funding agencies, the National Institutes of Health, or the U.S. Department of Health and Human ServicesAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study makes use of aggregated and anonymised human mobility data publicly available at www.google.com/covid19/mobility/I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll the data used in the paper are publicly available and the sources are cited within the text. The data produced in the study are available upon request to the authors}, URL = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/11/26/2021.11.24.21266820}, eprint = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/11/26/2021.11.24.21266820.full.pdf}, journal = {medRxiv} }