RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Examining the intersection of child protection and public housing: development, health and justice outcomes using linked administrative data
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.11.24.21266838
DO 10.1101/2021.11.24.21266838
A1 Catia Malvaso
A1 Alicia Montgomerie
A1 Rhiannon Pilkington
A1 Emma Baker
A1 John Lynch
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/11/26/2021.11.24.21266838.abstract
AB Objective We described development, health and justice system outcomes for children in contact with child protection and public housing.Design Descriptive analysis of outcomes for children known to child protection who also had contact with public housing drawn from the South Australian (SA) Better Evidence Better Outcomes Linked Data (BEBOLD) platform.Setting The BEBOLD platform holds linked administrative records collected by government agencies for whole-population successive birth cohorts in South Australia beginning in 1999.Participants This study included data from birth registrations, perinatal, child protection, public housing, hospital, emergency department, early education, and youth justice for all SA children born 1999-2013 and followed until 2016. The base population notified at least once to child protection was n=67,454.Primary outcome measure Contact with the public housing system.Secondary outcome measures hospitalisations and emergency department presentations before age 5, and early education at age 5, and youth justice contact before age 17.Results More than 60% of children with at least one notification to child protection had contact with public housing, and 60.2% of those known to both systems were known to housing first. Children known to both systems experienced more emergency department and hospitalisation contacts, greater developmental vulnerability and were about 6 times more likely to have youth justice system contact.Conclusions There is substantial overlap between involvement with child protection and public housing in SA. Those children are more likely to face a life trajectory characterised by greater contact with the health system, greater early life developmental vulnerability, and greater contact with the criminal justice system. Ensuring the highest quality of supportive early life infrastructure for families in public housing may contribute to prevention of contact with child protection and better life trajectories for children.Strengths and limitations of this studyThis descriptive study provides epidemiological insight into the largely unexplored intersection between child protection and housing systems using whole-of-population linked administrative dataThe findings of this study are based on data drawn from South Australia and may not be directly generalizable to other locations because of different administrative systemsDespite data being drawn from one Australian jurisdiction, the qualitative relationship between child protection and housing is likely to be similarCompeting Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementC.M., R.P., and A.M were supported by the Early Intervention Research Directorate, Department for Human Services, South Australian Government. C.M. is supported by a Discovery Early Career Researcher Award, Australian Research Council (DE200100679). J.L., and R.P are supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia Centre of Research Excellence (1099422).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethics approval was granted by the SA Department of Health Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC; 377/06/2013; HREC/13/SAH/106), the University of Adelaide HREC (H-185-2011), and the Aboriginal Health Research Ethics Committee (REC2411/9/14). Approval to use these data was also provided by the custodians of each data source.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data underlying this article were provided by several Australian State and Commonwealth government agencies under agreements with the researchers led by author J. W. Lynch, SA NT Datalink as the independent linkage authority and multiple ethics committees. Data is only able to be accessed by researchers who have entered into agreements with the Data Custodians and are approved users by the Human Research Ethics Committee. Data can be accessed through an application and approval process administered by the independent data linkage authority, SA NT Datalink.