The Understanding persistent Pain Where it ResiDes study of low back pain cohort profile - Jenkins, Luke C; Chang, Wei-Ju; Buscemi, Valentina; Liston, Matthew; Nicholas, Michael; Graven-Nielsen, Thomas; Hodges, Paul W; Wasinger, Valerie C; Stone, Laura S; Dorsey, Susan G; McAuley, James H; Schabrun, Siobhan M (medRxiv, 2021)
Background Despite chronic low back pain (LBP) being considered a biopsychosocial condition for diagnosis and management, few studies have investigated neurophysiological or neurobiological risk factors thought to underpin the transition from acute to chronic LBP. The aim of this cohort profile is to describe the methodology, compare baseline characteristics between acute LBP participants and pain-free controls, and compare LBP participants with or without completed follow-up.Methods 120 individuals experiencing acute LBP and 57 pain-free controls were recruited to participate in the Understanding Persistent Pain Where it Resides (UPWaRD) study. Screening was conducted via email and phone. Neurobiological, psychological, and sociodemographic data were collected at baseline, three- and six-months. LBP status was assessed using the numerical rating scale and Roland-Morris disability questionnaire at three and six-month follow-up.Results 95 participants (79%) provided outcome data at three-month follow-up and 96 participants (80%) at six-months. Participants who did not complete follow-up at three- and six-months within the UPWaRD LBP cohort had higher psychological distress, higher pain interference, higher levels of moderate physical activity, and reported occupational difficulties due to pain (P = <0.05). Compared to controls, LBP participants in the UPWaRD cohort were older, had a higher BMI, a higher prevalence of comorbidities and higher medication usage. Higher depression, anxiety and stress, lower pain self-efficacy and higher pain catastrophizing during acute LBP were correlated with higher six-month pain and disability (P = < 0.01).Conclusions This cohort profile reports baseline characteristics of the UPWaRD LBP and pain-free control cohort.Competing Interest StatementSMS and PWH receive salary support from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (1105040 and 1102905, respectively). TGN is a part of Centre for Neuroplasticity and Pain (CNAP) that is supported by the Danish National Research Foundation (DNRF121).Clinical Protocols http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029027 https://anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=376573 Funding StatementThis work was supported by grant 1059116 from the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) of Australia.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:All study procedures were approved by the Human Research Ethics Committees of Western Sydney University (H10465) and Neuroscience Research Australia (SSA: 16/002) and in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 1983. All participants provided written, informed consent for participation in the study and its related procedures.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.