PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Taylor R. Thomas AU - Ashton J. Tener AU - Ji Seung Yang AU - John F. Strang AU - Jacob J. Michaelson TI - Dimensional characterizations of gender diversity are associated with higher polygenic propensity for cognitive performance in a neurodiverse sample AID - 10.1101/2021.11.22.21266696 DP - 2021 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2021.11.22.21266696 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/11/24/2021.11.22.21266696.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/11/24/2021.11.22.21266696.full AB - Both sex and gender are characteristics that play a key role in risk and resilience in health and well-being. Current research lacks the ability to quantitatively describe gender and gender diversity, and is limited to endorsement of categorical gender identities, which are contextually and culturally dependent. A more objective, dimensional approach to characterizing gender diversity will enable researchers to advance the health of gender-diverse people by better understanding how genetic factors interact to determine health outcomes. To address this research gap, we leveraged the Gender Self-Report (GSR), a questionnaire that captures multiple dimensions of gender diversity. We then performed polygenic score associations with brain-related traits like cognitive performance, personality, and neuropsychiatric conditions. The GSR was completed by N = 818 independent adults with or without autism in the SPARK cohort, and GSR factor analysis identified two factors: Binary (divergence from gender presumed by designated sex to the opposite) and Nonbinary (divergence from male and female gender norms) Gender Diversity (BGD and NGD, respectively). We performed polygenic associations (controlling for age, sex, and autism diagnostic status) in a subset of N = 452 individuals and found higher polygenic propensity for cognitive performance was associated with greater BGD (β = 0.017, p = 0.049) and NGD (β = 0.036, p = 0.002), and higher polygenic propensity for educational attainment was also associated with greater NGD (β = 0.030, p = 0.015). We did not observe any significant associations with personality or neuropsychiatric polygenic scores in this sample. Overall, our results suggest cognitive processes and gender diversity share overlapping genetic factors, indicating the biological utility of the GSR while also underscoring the importance of quantitatively measuring gender diversity in health research contexts.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (MH105527 and DC014489 to JM) and the National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH100028 to JS), as well as grants from the Simons Foundation (SFARI 516716 to JM), the Clinical and Translational Science Award (KL2TR001877 to JM), the Fahs-Beck Fellow Grant to JS, and the National Institutes of Health Predoctoral training grant (T32GM008629 to TT). This work was supported by the University of Iowa Hawkeye Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center (Hawk-IDDRC) through the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P50HD103556).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The IRB of the University of Iowa gave ethical approval for this work.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe SPARK genetic data can be obtained at SFARI Base. The SPARK Research Match data will be available to qualified, approved researchers through SFARI Base upon publication of this article. https://base.sfari.org