RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and hesitancy among residents of Northern California jails
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.11.22.21266559
DO 10.1101/2021.11.22.21266559
A1 Yiran E Liu
A1 Jillian Oto
A1 John Will
A1 Christopher LeBoa
A1 Alexis Doyle
A1 Neil Rens
A1 Shelley Aggarwal
A1 Iryna Kalish
A1 Marcela Rodriguez
A1 Beruk Sherif
A1 Chrisele Trinidad
A1 Michael Del Rosario
A1 Sophie Allen
A1 Robert Spencer
A1 Carlos Morales
A1 Alexander Chyorny
A1 Jason R Andrews
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/11/24/2021.11.22.21266559.abstract
AB Background Carceral facilities are high-risk settings for COVID-19 transmission. Understanding of factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and hesitancy among incarcerated individuals is incomplete, especially for people living in jails.Methods We conducted a retrospective review of COVID-19 vaccination data from the electronic health record (EHR) of residents in two Northern California county jails to examine factors associated with vaccine uptake in this population. We additionally administered a survey in four jails to assess reasons for vaccine hesitancy, sources of COVID-19 information, and medical mistrust. We performed multivariate logistic regression to determine associations with vaccine uptake or hesitancy.Results Of 2,584 jail residents offered a COVID-19 vaccine between March 19, 2021 and June 30, 2021, 1,464 (56.7%) accepted at least one dose. Among vaccinated residents, 538 (36.7%) initially refused the vaccine. Vaccine uptake was higher among older individuals, women, those with recent flu vaccination, and those living in shared cells or open dorms. Leading reasons for vaccine hesitancy included concerns around side effects and suboptimal efficacy. Television and friends/family were the most commonly cited and the most trusted sources of COVID-19 information, respectively. Vaccine acceptance was associated with increased trust in COVID-19 information sources and in medical personnel both in and out of jail.Conclusion Ongoing evidence-based COVID-19 vaccination efforts are needed in high-risk carceral settings. Effective interventions to improve vaccination rates in this population should utilize accessible and trusted sources of information to address concerns about vaccine side effects and efficacy and foster medical trust.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementSupported by the COVID-19 Emergency Response Fund from Stanford University, which was established with a gift from the Horowitz Family Foundation. YEL is funded by the Knight-Hennessy Scholars Program and National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program (DGE-1656518). The funders had no involvement in any aspect of the study.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This work was approved by the IRBs of Stanford University (#56169) and Santa Clara Valley Medical Center (#20-022).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData from the present study are not currently available due to ethical and privacy concerns but may be made available in de-identified or aggregate form in the future, as allowed by the IRB.