PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Katherine G Young AU - Timothy J McDonald AU - Beverley M Shields TI - HbA1c measurements from UK Biobank are different to those in linked primary care records: implications for combining biochemistry data from research studies and routine clinical care AID - 10.1101/2021.11.20.21266511 DP - 2021 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2021.11.20.21266511 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/11/21/2021.11.20.21266511.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/11/21/2021.11.20.21266511.full AB - Data linkage of cohort or RCT data with routinely collected data is becoming increasingly commonplace, and this often involves combining biomarker measurements from different sources. However, sources may have different biases due to differences in assay method and calibration. Combining these measurements, or diagnoses based on these measurements, is therefore not always valid. We highlight an example using glycated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) test results from two different sources in UK Biobank data.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study was funded by Research England's Expanding Excellence in England (E3) fund.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The North West Multi-centre Research Ethics Committee gave ethical approval to UK Biobank (REC reference: 11/NW/03820).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesUK Biobank data are available through a procedure described at http://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/using-the-resource/.