%0 Journal Article %A Lauro Estivalete Marchionatti %A Paula Blaya-Rocha %A Pedro Vieira da Silva Magalhães %T Mood stabilizer: a concept analysis and operationalization of a model %D 2021 %R 10.1101/2021.11.13.21266303 %J medRxiv %P 2021.11.13.21266303 %X Background The term “mood stabilizer” is controversial in literature. As there is no consensual meaning, its retirement has been suggested to avoid confusion and misuse. On the other hand, it remains largely employed, and some advocate it carries an important meaning. This issue has not been previously approached using a validated qualitative inquiry.Methods We employed document analysis for reviewing proposed definitions for mood stabilizer. Then, we used concept analysis as a qualitative methodology to clarify meanings associated with the term. Based on its results, we built a theoretical model for mood stabilizer, matching it with evidence for drugs used in the treatment of bipolar disorder.Results Concept analysis of documents defining the term unearthed four attributes of a mood stabilizer that could be usefully nested into the following ascending hierarchy: “not worsening”, “acute effects”, “prophylactic effects”, and “advanced effects”. To be considered a mood stabilizer, a drug had to reach the “prophylactic effects” tier, as this was discussed by authors as the core aspect of the class. After arranging drugs according to this scheme, “lithium” and “quetiapine” received the label, but only the former fulfilled all four attributes, as evidence indicates it has neuroprotective action.Conclusion The proposed model uses a hierarchy of attributes that take into account the complexity of the term and help to determine whether a drug is a mood stabilizer. Prophylaxis is pivotal to the concept, whose utility lies in implying a drug able to truly treat bipolar disorder, as opposed to merely targeting symptoms. This could modify long-term outcomes and illness trajectory.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study was funded by the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPQq, Brazil. PVSM is supported by a National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) productivity fellowship.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript %U https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2021/11/16/2021.11.13.21266303.full.pdf