RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Individual factors influencing public’s perceptions about the importance of COVID-19 immunity certificates: a cross-sectional online questionnaire survey in the UK
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.11.12.21266256
DO 10.1101/2021.11.12.21266256
A1 Corina-Elena Niculaescu
A1 Isabel Karen Sassoon
A1 Irma Cecilia Landa-Avila
A1 Ozlem Colak
A1 Gyuchan Thomas Jun
A1 Panagiotis Balatsoukas
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/11/15/2021.11.12.21266256.abstract
AB Objectives To assess what were the main individual factors influencing people’s perception of the importance of using COVID-19 immunity certificates.Design Cross-sectional online survey.Setting Nationally representative survey in the UK, conducted on the 3rd of August 2021.Participants Responses from 534 participants, aged 18 and older, residents of the UK.Interventions This was a cross-sectional survey and each participant replied to the same set of questions.Primary outcome measure and independent variables The primary outcome measure (dependent variable) was the participants’ perceived importance of using immunity certificates, computed as an index of six items. The following individual drivers were used as the independent variables: a) personal beliefs about COVID-19 (using constructs adapted from the Health Belief Model), b) personal views on vaccination, c) willingness to share immunity status with service providers, and d) variables related to respondents’ lifestyle and socio-demographic characteristics.Results Perceived importance of immunity certificates was higher among respondents who felt that contracting COVID-19 would have a severe negative impact on their health (β=0.2564, p=0.0000) and felt safer if vaccinated (β =0.1552, p=0.0000). The prospect of future economic recovery positively influenced perceived importance of immunity certificates. Respondents who were employed or self-employed (β=-0.2412, p=0.0010), or experienced an increase in income after the COVID-19 pandemic (β=-0.1287, p=0.0020) perceived less important the use of immunity certificates compared to those who were unemployed or had retired or those who had experienced reduction in their income during the pandemic.Conclusions The findings of our survey suggest that more vulnerable members in our society (unemployed or retired and those believing that COVID-19 would have a severe impact on their health) and people who experienced a reduction in income during the pandemic perceived the severity of not using immunity certificates in their daily life as higher.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementIMMUNE or Immunity Passport Service Design is a nine-month project funded by the AHRC/UKRI COVID-19 Rapid Response (Ref. AH/W000288/1).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethics approval was obtained from the College of Engineering, Design and Physical Sciences Research Ethics Committee at Brunel University London (Ref. 31705-A-Jul/2021- 33586-1) on the 29th of July 2021.Informed consent was obtained from all respondents prior to the beginning of the survey. Respondents were allowed to withdraw from the survey at any time.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data is available in a public, open access repository. All materials are freely available on OSF (https://osf.io/jubv6/) https://osf.io/jubv6/