RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Collecting genetic samples and linked mental health data from adolescents in schools: Protocol co-production and a mixed-methods pilot of feasibility and acceptability
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.10.26.20219774
DO 10.1101/2020.10.26.20219774
A1 Warne, Naomi
A1 Rook, Sarah
A1 Bevan-Jones, Rhys
A1 Brown, Rachel
A1 Bates, Lesley
A1 Hopkins-Jones, Lucinda
A1 Evans, Alexandra
A1 Hall, Jeremy
A1 Langley, Kate
A1 Thapar, Anita
A1 Walters, James
A1 Murphy, Simon
A1 Moore, Graham
A1 Rice, Frances
A1 Collishaw, Stephan
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/11/10/2020.10.26.20219774.abstract
AB Objectives To co-produce a school-based protocol and examine acceptability and feasibility of collecting saliva samples for genetic studies from secondary/high school students for the purpose of mental health research.Design Protocol co-production and mixed-methods feasibility pilot.Setting Secondary schools in Wales, UK.Participants Students aged 11-13 years.Primary and secondary outcome measures Co-produced research protocol including an interactive science workshop delivered in schools; school, parental and student recruitment rates; adherence to protocol and adverse events; ability to extract and genotype saliva samples; student enjoyment of the science workshop; and qualitative analysis of teacher focus groups on acceptability and feasibility.Results Five secondary schools participated in the co-production phase, and three of these took part in the research study (eligible sample n=868 students). Four further schools were subsequently approached, but none participated. Parental opt-in consent was received from 98 parents (11.3% eligible sample), three parents (0.3%) actively refused and responses were not received for 767 (88.4%) parents. We obtained saliva samples plus consent for data linkage for 79 students. Only one sample was of insufficient quality to be genotyped. The science workshop received positive feedback from students. Feedback from teachers showed that undertaking research like this in schools is viewed as acceptable in principle, potentially feasible, but that there are important procedural barriers to be overcome. Key recommendations include establishing close working relationships between the research team and school classroom staff, together with improved methods for communicating with and engaging parents.Conclusions There are major challenges to undertaking large scale genetic mental health research in secondary schools. Such research may be acceptable in principle, and in practice DNA collected from saliva in classrooms is of sufficient quality. However, key challenges that must be overcome include ensuring representative recruitment of schools and sufficient parental engagement where opt-in parental consent is required.Strengths and limitations of this studyThis is the first study to test the feasibility and acceptability of collecting genetic samples in secondary schools and obtaining consent for linkage to questionnaire and record-based mental health data.A key strength is co-production of the research protocol with stakeholders (young people, parents/guardians, schools).We used a mixed-methods approach to assess the feasibility and acceptability of carrying out genetic research studies of mental health in schools.This pilot study was conducted in three mainstream secondary schools in Wales, UK so it is unclear whether findings are transferrable to a wider section of schools in Wales and other countries, education systems and age groups.It was not possible to collect data on the reasons for return or non-return of parental consent.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by a UK Medical Research Council Mental Health Data Pathfinder grant (MC_PC_17212). The work was undertaken with the support of The Centre for the Development and Evaluation of Complex Interventions for Public Health Improvement (DECIPHer), a UKCRC Public Health Research Centre of Excellence. Joint funding (MR/KO232331/1) from the British Heart Foundation, Cancer Research UK, Economic and Social Research Council, Medical Research Council, the Welsh Government and the Wellcome Trust, under the auspices of the UK Clinical Research Collaboration, is gratefully acknowledged. The work was undertaken with support from the Public Health Improvement Research Network (PHIRN). PHIRN is part of the National Centre for Population Health and Wellbeing Research funded by Health and Care Research Wales, Welsh GovernmentAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study was approved by Cardiff University School of Medicine Research Ethics Committee (ref 18/57).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData are available upon reasonable request.