RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Public engagement and crowdfunding for health research: A global qualitative evidence synthesis and TDR pilot
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.11.08.21266070
DO 10.1101/2021.11.08.21266070
A1 Kpokiri, Eneyi E.
A1 Sri-Pathmanathan, Clarisse
A1 Shrestha, Priyanka
A1 Navaid, Sana
A1 Wiwatpanit, Teerawat
A1 Wijegunawardana, Asha
A1 Ali Umar, Mahmud
A1 Jackson, Debra
A1 Alger, Jackeline
A1 Bohren, Meghan A.
A1 Hoole, Mia
A1 Labarda, Meredith
A1 Juban, Noel
A1 Launois, Pascal
A1 Halpaap, Beatrice
A1 Tang, Weiming
A1 Tucker, Joseph D.
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/11/08/2021.11.08.21266070.abstract
AB Background Many exceptional researchers, especially in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) face structural disadvantages in applying for research grants. Public engagement and crowdfunding make it possible for researchers to directly seek support from the public, by engaging large groups of people who make small contributions to support a project. This manuscript synthesizes global qualitative evidence and describes a WHO-TDR public engagement and crowdfunding pilot programme.Methods We searched six databases for primary qualitative and mixed-methods research. We used a thematic synthesis approach and assessed our findings using the GRADE-CERQual approach. A crowdfunding approach to finance research studies was tested through a pilot programme, with a focus on infectious diseases of poverty. TDR Global mentors provided support for five finalists to engage the public and develop crowdfunding campaigns.Results Nine studies were included in the qualitative evidence synthesis. Themes were developed into seven key findings, including the need for extensive public engagement, the potential for crowdfunding to open a communication channel between researchers and the public, key correlates of crowdfunding success and the risks of crowdfunding health research with associated mitigation strategies. The TDR pilot programme received 121 entries from 37 countries. Five LMIC-based researchers received training and joined a working group. Three researchers launched their crowdfunding campaigns, met their goals and received substantial monetary and non-monetary contributions.Conclusion Public engagement provides a foundation for effective crowdfunding for health research. Our evidence synthesis and pilot data provide practical strategies for LMIC researchers to engage the public and conduct crowdfunding campaigns.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe work received support from the TDR, the Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases, co-sponsored by UNICEF, UNDP, the World Bank and WHO. TDR is able to conduct its work, thanks to the commitment and support from a variety of funders. These include our long-term core contributors from national governments and international institutions, as well as designated funding for specific projects within our current priorities. TDR receives additional funding from Sida, the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency, to support SIHIAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authorsAbbreviationMeaningAIArtificial IntelligenceCERQualConfidence in Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative researchCLCutaneous leishmaniasisEMBASEExcerpta Medica databaseLMICsLow and Middle-Income CountriesHICsHigh Income CountriesIDPsInfectious Diseases of PovertyMMMixed Methods studyNGOsNon-Governmental OrganisationsNTDsNeglected Tropical DiseasesPRISMA-ScRPreferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping ReviewsQUALQualitative studySESHSocial Entrepreneurship to Spur HealthSIHISocial Innovation in Health InitiativeTBTuberculosisTDRSpecial Programme for Research and Training in Tropical DiseasesUNICEFUnited Nations Children’s FundUNDPUnited Nations Development ProgrammeUKUnited KingdomUSUnited States of AmericaWHOWorld Health Organisation