PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - William Cross AU - Iben Lyskjær AU - Tom Lesluyes AU - Steven Hargreaves AU - Anna-Christina Strobl AU - Christopher Davies AU - Sara Waise AU - Shadi Hames AU - Dahmane Oukrif AU - Hongtao Ye AU - Fernanda Amary AU - Roberto Tirabosco AU - Toby Baker AU - David Barnes AU - Christopher Steele AU - Ludmil Alexandrov AU - Gareth Bond AU - Genomics England Research Consortium AU - Paul Cool AU - Nischalan Pillay AU - Peter Van Loo AU - Adrienne M Flanagan TI - A Genetic Model for Central Chondrosarcoma Evolution Correlates with Patient Outcome AID - 10.1101/2021.11.02.21265785 DP - 2021 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2021.11.02.21265785 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/11/08/2021.11.02.21265785.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/11/08/2021.11.02.21265785.full AB - The treatment options for central chondrosarcoma are limited, and prognoses are generally unreliable. The presence and absence of mutations in IDH1, and IDH2 are defining events, and TERT mutations have been recently been associated with poor outcome. Despite this, molecular biomarkers are lacking. Here, analysing data from 356 patients, comprising results from whole genome sequencing (n=68), digital droplet PCR (n=346), and methylation arrays (n=57), we present a comprehensive genetic analysis of chondrosarcoma and suggest its clinical utility. Methylation profiles, TERT promoter mutations, genome doubling with prior haploidisation, and age at diagnosis of high grade, distinguish IDH1-mutant, IDH2-mutant and IDH wildtype tumours. The majority of IDH2-mutant tumours harbour TERT mutations, though a significant reduction in survival is only found in the less common mutational combination of IDH1 and TERT. We suggest that diagnostic testing for IDH1, IDH2 and TERT mutations could guide clinical monitoring and prognostication.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementFunding for this study was received from Sarcoma UK (SUKG01.18), Bone Cancer Research Trust infrastructure grants to AMF and PC, RNOH NHS R&D grant (AMF). IL is supported by the Lundbeck Foundation (grant: R303-2018-3018). The project was also supported by the National Institute for Health Research, UCLH Biomedical Research Centre, the UCL Experimental Cancer Centre, and the Francis Crick Institute, which receives its core funding from Cancer Research UK (FC001202), the UK Medical Research Council (FC001202), and the Wellcome Trust (FC001202).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This is a retrospective study of already existing data. The original ethical approval was obtained from the Cambridgeshire 2 Research Ethics Service (09/H0308/165).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced are available via the supplementary material or online following application to Genomics England.