%0 Journal Article %A Preethi Krishnan %A Curtis Marshall %A Philip Yang %A Sivasubramanium V. Bhavani %A Andre Holder %A Annette Esper %A Rishikesan Kamaleswaran %T Autonomic dysfunction characterized by Heart Rate Variability among patients with Sepsis-related Acute Respiratory Failure %D 2021 %R 10.1101/2021.11.02.21265811 %J medRxiv %P 2021.11.02.21265811 %X Rationale To explore the association and implications of using Heart rate variability (HRV) derived from continuous bedside monitoring as a surrogate for detection of Acute Respiratory Failure (ARF) in critically ill sepsis patients.Objective To analyze HRV measures derived from continuous physiological data captured before ARF-onset to determine whether statistically significant markers can be characterized when compared to sepsis controls.Methods Retrospective HRV analysis of sepsis patients admitted to Emory Healthcare ICUs was performed between ARF and age and gender-matched controls. HRV measures such as time domain, frequency domain, nonlinear, and complexity measures were analyzed up to 1 hour before the onset of ARF, and a random event time in the sepsis-controls. Statistical significance was computed by the Wilcoxon Rank Sum test.Results A total of 89 intensive care unit (ICU) patients with sepsis were included in this retrospective cohort study. Time-domain HRV measures including pNN50 (the fraction of consecutive NN intervals that differ by more than 50 ms), RMSSD (root-mean-square differences of successive NN intervals), standard deviation, interquartile range, variance, and approximate entropy for Beat-to-Beat intervals strongly distinguished ARF patients from the controls group. HRV measures for nonlinear and frequency domains were significantly altered (p<0.05) among sepsis patients with ARF compared to controls. Frequency measures such as low frequency (LF), very low frequency (VLF), high frequency (HF), and SD1/SD2 ratio nonlinear measure (SD1:SD2) also showed a significant (p<0.05) increase in the ARF group patients. Multiscale entropy complexity was lower for ARF patients compared to the control counterparts. Detrended fluctuation analysis (DFA) showed a decreasing trend in ARF patients.Conclusions HRV was significantly impaired across sepsis patients who developed ARF when compared to sepsis controls, indicating a potential prognostic utility for earlier identification of the need for mechanical ventilation and management of patients suspected with sepsis.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementRK was funded by NIH NIGMS under R01GM139967, and NCATS under UL1TR002378 and the Surgical Critical Care Initiative (SC2i), Department of Defense Health Program Joint Program Committee 6 / Combat Casualty Care (USUHS HT9404-13-1-0032 and HU0001-15-2-0001). PY is supported by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI 5T32HL116271-08). SVB is supported by the National Institute for General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health ( K23GM144867). ALH is supported by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health (K23GM37182).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Emory University Institutional Review Board, IRB #STUDY00000302 gave ethical approval for this work.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors %U https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2021/11/03/2021.11.02.21265811.full.pdf