TY - JOUR T1 - Predictors of COVID testing among Australian youth: Insights from the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2021.10.31.21265627 SP - 2021.10.31.21265627 AU - Md Irteja Islam AU - Verity Chadwick AU - Alexandra Martiniuk Y1 - 2021/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/11/01/2021.10.31.21265627.abstract N2 - Background Testing has played a crucial role in reducing the spread of COVID. Although COVID symptoms tend to be less severe in children and adolescents, a key concern is young people’s role in the transmission of the virus given their highly social lifestyles. In this study, we aimed to identify the predictors associated with COVID testing in Australian youth using data from the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children (LSAC).Methods We used the latest wave 9C1 of the LSAC, where data were collected from 16–21-year-old Australians via an online survey between October and December 2021. In total, 2291 Australian youths responded to the questions about COVID testing and COVID symptom severity. Data was stratified by living with/without parents, and bivariate and logistic regression analyses examined predictor variables (age, sex, country of birth, remoteness, education level, employment, relationship status, number of household members, living with parents, receiving the COVID financial supplement from government and index of relative socio-economic advantage and disadvantage) and their distributions over the outcome variable COVID testing.Results Youths aged 16-17 were more likely to live at home than youths aged 20-21 years. The strongest predictor of COVID testing was living in major cities (regardless of living with or without parents). Changed household composition was significantly associated with COVID testing among the youths living in the parental home. While among the respondents living without their parents, living with multiple household members and low or no cohesion among household members was associated with higher rates of COVID testing.Conclusion Our study revealed young people have been very good at getting tested for COVID. To further incentivise testing in this age group, we should consider providing this age group with continued financial and social support while awaiting the outcome of the test and during any isolation.Strengths and limitations of this studyLarge national cohort of young people strengthened the findings of the study and allowing us to examine the factors associated with COVID testing for the first time in Australia.A broad-based assessment of potential predictors of COVID testing, including sociodemographic and coronavirus specific factor.Cross-sectional observational design limits causal inference.Self-reported information about COVID testing can be subject to recall as well as social desirability bias.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any fundingAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The LSAC has been approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of the Australian Institute of Family Studies (AIFS) (Application number 20-09), and written informed consent was obtained for all study participants. In addition, the authorship team obtained permission from Australian Data Archive Dataverse to use LSAC data for research and publications (Reference No. 263493).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe LSAC dataset is publicly available from the National Centre for Longitudinal Data (NCLD) Dataverse on request available at https://growingupinaustralia.gov.au/data-and-documentation/accessing-lsac-data. https://growingupinaustralia.gov.au/data-and-documentation/accessing-lsac-data ER -