TY - JOUR T1 - Comparison of the immunogenicity of BNT162b2 and CoronaVac COVID-19 Vaccines in Hong Kong JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2021.10.28.21265635 SP - 2021.10.28.21265635 AU - Chris Ka Pun Mok AU - Carolyn A Cohen AU - Samuel M.S. Cheng AU - Chunke Chen AU - Kin-On Kwok AU - Karen Yiu AU - Tat-On Chan AU - Maireid Bull AU - Kwun Cheung Ling AU - Zixi Dai AU - Susanna S Ng AU - Grace Chung-Yan Lui AU - Chao Wu AU - Gaya K. Amerasinghe AU - Daisy W Leung AU - Samuel Yeung Shan Wong AU - Sophie A Valkenburg AU - Malik Peiris AU - David S Hui Y1 - 2021/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/10/30/2021.10.28.21265635.abstract N2 - Background Few head-to-head evaluations of immune responses to difference vaccines have been reported.Methods Surrogate virus neutralization test (sVNT) antibody levels of adults receiving either 2 doses of BNT162b2 (n=366) or CoronaVac (n=360) vaccines in Hong Kong were determined. An age-matched subgroup (BNT162b2 (n=49) vs CoronaVac (n=49)) were tested for plaque reduction neutralizing (PRNT) and spike binding antibody and T cell reactivity in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC).Findings One month after the second dose of vaccine, BNT162b2 elicited significantly higher PRNT50, PRNT90, sVNT, spike receptor binding, spike N terminal domain binding, spike S2 domain binding, spike FcR binding and antibody avidity levels than CoronaVac. The geometric mean PRNT50 titres in those vaccinated with BNT162b2 and CoronaVac vaccines were 251.6 and 69.45 while PRNT90 titres were 98.91 and 16.57, respectively. All of those vaccinated with BNT162b2 and 45 (91.8%) of 49 vaccinated with CoronaVac achieved the 50% protection threshold for PRNT90. Allowing for an expected seven-fold waning of antibody titres over six months for those receiving CoronaVac, only 16.3% would meet the 50% protection threshold versus 79.6% of BNT162b2 vaccinees. Age was negatively correlated with PRNT90 antibody titres. Both vaccines induced SARS-CoV-2 specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses at 1-month post-vaccination but CoronaVac elicited significantly higher structural protein-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses.Conclusion Vaccination with BNT162b2 induces stronger humoral responses than CoronaVac. CoronaVac induce higher CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses to the structural protein than BNT162b2.Summary At a Glance Through the head-to-head comparison, vaccination with BNT162b2 induces significantly higher levels of SARS-CoV-2 specific binding and neutralizing antibody responses when compared to CoronaVac. CoronaVac induce higher CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses to the structural protein than BNT162b2.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis research was supported by grants from the Health and Medical Research Fund Commissioned Research on the Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19), Hong Kong SAR (COVID1903003) (CKPM, SSN, GCL, MP and DSH), (COVID-190115 and COVID-190126, SAV), Guangdong Province International Scientific and Technological Cooperation Projects (2020A0505100063) (CKPM), the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded through the Korea government (NRF-2018M3A9H4055203) (CKPM), US National Institutes of Health (contract no. HHSN272201400006C) (MP), National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC)/Research Grants Council (RGC) Joint Research Scheme (N_HKU737/18) (CKPM and MP) and RGC theme-based research scheme (T11-712/19-N and T11-705/21-N) (DSH). Research was partly supported by Fast Grant ##2161 (Emergent Ventures) to G.K.A., and NIH grants (P01AI120943, R01AI123926 to G.K.A.; R01AI107056 to D.W.L.).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study was approved by the Joint Chinese University of Hong Kong-New Territories East Cluster Clinical Research Ethics Committee (Ref no: 2020.229) and all participants provided written consent.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript ER -