RT Journal Article SR Electronic T1 Designing an evidence-based Bayesian network for estimating the risk versus benefits of AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine JF medRxiv FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press SP 2021.10.28.21265588 DO 10.1101/2021.10.28.21265588 A1 Helen J. Mayfield A1 Colleen L. Lau A1 Jane E. Sinclair A1 Samuel J. Brown A1 Andrew Baird A1 John Litt A1 Aapeli Vuorinen A1 Kirsty R. Short A1 Michael Waller A1 Kerrie Mengersen YR 2021 UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/10/29/2021.10.28.21265588.abstract AB Uncertainty surrounding the risk of developing and dying from Thrombosis and Thromobocytopenia Syndrome (TTS) associated with the AstraZeneca (AZ) COVID-19 vaccine may contribute to vaccine hesitancy. A model is urgently needed to combine and effectively communicate the existing evidence on the risks versus benefits of the AZ vaccine. We developed a Bayesian network to consolidate the existing evidence on risks and benefits of the AZ vaccine, and parameterised the model using data from a range of empirical studies, government reports, and expert advisory groups. Expert judgement was used to interpret the available evidence and determine the structure of the model, relevant variables, data to be included, and how these data were used to inform the model.The model can be used as a decision support tool to generate scenarios based on age, sex, virus variant and community transmission rates, making it a useful for individuals, clinicians, and researchers to assess the chances of different health outcomes. Model outputs include the risk of dying from TTS following the AZ COVID-19 vaccine, the risk of dying from COVID-19 or COVID-19-associated atypical severe blood clots under different scenarios. Although the model is focused on Australia, it can be easily adaptable to international settings by re-parameterising it with local data. This paper provides detailed description of the model-building methodology, which can used to expand the scope of the model to include other COVID-19 vaccines, booster doses, comorbidities and other health outcomes (e.g., long COVID) to ensure the model remains relevant in the face of constantly changing discussion on risks versus benefits of COVID-19 vaccination.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. CLL was supported by an Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Fellowship (APP1193826).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:N/AI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript.